The Xinhua Dictionary is an indispensable tool book for many people to learn and Xi when they were young, and almost everyone has one. In fact, at home, it is also a common reference book, because not only students use it, but many adults will also pick up the Xinhua dictionary to check the definition of certain words when they need it. It can be said that Xinhua Dictionary is accompanied by the growth of each of us.
However, just recently, many people have heard a particularly unexpected news that Xinhua Dictionary has been suedBecause two netizens (some people say that these two are associate professors) found that there are many improper interpretations in the new version of Xinhua Dictionary, so they took a paragraph of ** and officially sued Xinhua Dictionary.
So in the new version of the Xinhua dictionary, what are the inappropriate definitions?In **, these two netizens also have a more detailed explanation. The first is the word "play" for play, and in its interpretation, the word *** appears;The second is the word "don't", and the sentence with a pistol in the waist appears;There is also the word "tired", one of which is explained that the child has become a burden when he is young.
The most incredible thing is that the explanation of the word "倭" is only a simple sentence, which was called Japan in ancient times. You must know that in the previous Xinhua dictionary, whenever a word was explained, it would be represented by a common word. If you omit this word in the dictionary, wouldn't it be a write-off of the historical crimes committed by the Japanese Kou?In addition, there are many pinyin errors.
After reading the ** released by these two, I hurriedly took a new version of the Xinhua dictionary, and when I checked it, it was really as they said. In fact, it is not a new edition of the dictionary, which is already the case in the 11th edition. And as early as before, some netizens have questioned that there have been a variety of improper interpretations in a certain version of the Xinhua dictionary.
As we all know, most Xinhua dictionaries are reference books for primary school students, so this inappropriate interpretation is undoubtedly a wrong value orientation. Some parents thought it was incredible when they saw it, and said how to explain it if their children askedSo how did this happen?
Was it deliberate, or was it negligent?I think everybody asks questions, and in fact we all understand what's going on. After seeing this paragraph, most netizens expressed that they must support it, and they hope that the relevant departments will pay attention to this matter and give a reasonable explanation.