The mainland factory was relocated, and the replaced country felt urgent
Cannot China's position as the world's factory be replaced?
This assertion is of course irreplaceable in our own opinion, but in many foreign countries, this market position can be replaced, especially now that many factories are moving to India, Mexico and Vietnam in large numbers. India, in particular, has long believed that Made in India can replace Made in China.
Therefore, in this case, the United States** believes that the mainland market has been replaced by the mainland market, and begins to be anxious, trying to find a large number of factories to move to the mainland. In order to consolidate"The world's factory"We continue to deepen our advantages in the field of global discourse.
It would be a lie to say that we are not anxious, we now have a very large number of potential competitors, and behind this, the United States and its allies are still persuading many companies to abandon the mainland ** chain and look for alternatives through other incentives. Under this external influence, we have a certain impact. If we want to eliminate future displacements and reduce the impact of hedge, we will have to roll out some plans, such as relocating factories to the mainland, to continue to maintain our competitive advantage.
Therefore, from this point of view, it is not a completely wrong perception that the United States ** says that we are in a hurry. Of course, the United States is also very clear that even if the pace of China's chain substitution is accelerated now, it is impossible for the United States, Europe and Japan to give up their dependence on the mainland.
Hansen, an American economist at Harvard University, said that in the foreseeable future, China will become a major player in the world's manufacturing industry. This is because China's production capacity is too large, so for a long time, the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries will have to rely on China's ** chain.
Hansen's comments are not an exaggeration, according to CEIC survey data, China's 15 central and western provinces exported $630 billion in the 12 months to August, much higher than India, Mexico and Vietnam in the same period. This shows that the growth rate of exports in the interior has not been affected by the relocation of a large number of factories and continues to be faster than that of countries that are ready to replace our market position.
It is worth noting that the production centers established on the coast of China are still the main base of global production. In other words, our production scale continues to expand. In this case, it will be difficult for them to shake our position in a short period of time, and they can only continue to rely on our **.
In addition, the quality of Chinese products is also a fundamental aspect that cannot be overlooked. Some time ago, when the quality of iPhone products was questioned, the position of Indian workers was that if they could get the same wages as mainland workers, then they could also make products of the same quality. In other words, the quality of production in India is far inferior to that of the mainland.
At this point, one might ask, in order to make our low labor cost advantage less obvious, our production capacity may have to be replaced by outsiders in cases where we are unable to reduce our overall costs. But personally, we already have a strong position in the manufacturing of many products, the volume of orders is enough to give us an average wage increase, and we can also reduce the overall cost and continue to maintain our advantage in the mainland market.
Then, in terms of ** and quality, as well as scale, it is a huge challenge for Vietnam, Mexico and India to replace the ** chain of the mainland. The opinion of the United States ** is also clear: they cannot replace us in a short time. What are your thoughts on this?Everyone is welcome to leave a message, like and share on this topic!