Deep inspection cannot be a prop

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-29

The terms "in-depth investigation" and "in-depth examination" are often used in briefings on the treatment of certain individuals. The so-called in-depth investigation, in other words, is to say hello, ask about the situation, and go through the motions. Something very simple, there are both parties, there are witness testimonies;There are recordings, there are **, the facts are clear, and they are understood. Is there still a need for an "investigation"?Some of them even went to great lengths to form an investigation team to conduct an "in-depth" investigation, which seemed to be quite serious and seriousThen look at the processing results and make a "deep inspection" one by one. The so-called in-depth inspection, in other words, is today's weather hahaha, or to remind the other party: you have to pay attention to the way in the future, don't let the other party record the audio record**. So the parties made an "inspection": they must pay attention to it in the future.

Isn't this just a burlesque?Specifically designed to deal with the public.

Let's talk about something that just happened. A parent of a student in Xiaoyi City, Shanxi Province called ** to report the problem to Guo Jianhong, director of the Education Science and Technology Bureau, in the communication, the student's parent said that he wanted to report to the higher authorities, so even burst into foul language, and said arrogantly: "Who do you like to find and who to go", "I am not afraid of anything." ”

Regarding this matter, the reply of the Xiaoyi City ** Office is that the specific situation is being verified. Subsequently, the Municipal Information Office issued a [circular] saying, "attach great importance to it and instruct the person in charge of the Municipal Education Science and Technology Bureau to give a detailed explanation of the situation reported by the parents of students and make a deep inspection." ”

What a "great attention", a good "deep inspection"!

1. Guo Jianhong, as the main of the **functional department**, has no "people-centered" thinking in his heart, his quality is low, and his behavior has affected the image and credibility of the **, a so-called "deep inspection" is not too perfunctory!It's time to take responsibility.

2. Guo Jianhong, as a public servant, made a big official to abuse the work object, and his behavior violated work discipline and professional ethicsThere should be a corresponding punishment policy.

3. Guo Jianhong abused the parents of the students who reported the problem, and at least he should publicly apologize. Guo Mouhong is like this to the parents of students, and what is his attitude towards the employees and school teachers in the bureau?Is it arbitrary, arbitrary, and domineering, listening to what he said, "I am not afraid of anything", on the basis of this sentence, it is recommended that the higher-level departments seriously investigate, so that the director of the bureau will be in awe of the law, rules, discipline, and responsibility.

Related Pages