Currently, inAnti-corruptionIn the work of defeat, the ** Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision passed the disclosureThe total amount of corruption in the case is an attempt to increase transparency and preserve societyFairness and justice。However, with the increasing number of published cases and the total amount of corruption, society has begun to face a flood of corruption data, and the figures of hundreds of millions, billions, and tens of billions are staggering. It is worth pondering whether this method of publication is really effective and whether it will trigger bad emotions in society.
The current way of disclosing the total amount of corruption may not be the most appropriate way to increase transparency. Because when people are faced with a huge amount of ** money, it is inevitable that there will be a sense of panic and uneasiness. Too much data can plunge society into a quagmire of negative emotions, potentially threatening social stability. Perhaps we should reconsider whether to disclose the specific total amount of corruption to avoid excessive anxiety in society.
PublicThe total amount of corruption in the case is certainly an intuitive way to increase transparency, but it is not the only way to convey information. In addition to the number and amount, the more direct way is to convey to the society through the story behind the case, through publicity workAnti-corruptionThe results and importance of the work.
We can show it in a more vivid wayThe process of being brought to justice leads the public to focus on the side of justice. Through case reviews, interviews with parties, and mass witnesses, the public can feel itAnti-corruptionPositive change and social progress in the work of failure. This will not only help the public understand betterAnti-corruptionThe significance of bad work can also convey information while avoiding the negative impact of too many numbers on society.
Alternatively, the amount should be scaled appropriately to reduce the pressure on society and avoid excessive panic. For example, the amount can be converted into units to use ordinary things that are closer to public life as a metaphor to make it easier for the public to understand and accept. At the same time, strengthen theAnti-corruptionPropaganda of the work of failure to make the public fully informedAnti-corruptionThe justice and necessity of the work.
PassedEducationthe public, can improve their interest inAnti-corruptionBad sense of identity with the work, thereby mitigating possible negative effects. Transparency forAnti-corruptionFailure is critical, but more caution is needed when disclosing information. Whether the total amount of corruption is made public and how it is chosen requires a careful balance of factors while maintaining transparency.
Don't publish it againTotally, it doesn't make sense?"This question is not absolute, but it is necessary to constantly find a balance in practiceAnti-corruptionFailure work to better serve the community.
Increased transparency can promote compliance with the law and serve as a warning to those with bad intentions. However, using the total amount of corruption as the only way to disclose it may have some negative consequences. We could consider taking a more cautious approach and choosing to publish only when publishingAnti-corruptionThe number of major cases that have been lost, without disclosing the specific total amount of corruption. In this way, information can be conveyed and too many numbers can be avoided from having a negative impact on society.
In the formulationAnti-corruptionMore attention should be paid to the influence of social psychology and public opinion when implementing work policies and programmes. Only when the public understands and supports it can it be better promotedAnti-corruptionFailure to carry out the work. PassedEducationThe public, strengthened publicity, can raise their toAnti-corruptionDefeat the sense of identity of the work, mitigating possible negative impacts.
In short, increaseAnti-corruptionTransparency is necessary, but more caution is needed when disclosing the total amount of corruption. Deliver it in other waysAnti-corruptionFailing the results of our work and directing public attention to justice is another way to increase transparency. Simply releasing the total amount of corruption may not be able to achieve the desired effect. Only on the basis of continuous exploration and reflection can we find a better balance and make the following:Anti-corruptionDefeat work more forcefully, for social stability andFairness and justicePlay a bigger role.