Recently, the Russian Satellite News Agency reported on the air strikes launched by the US military against anti-US armed groups in Iraq, which caused widespread concern and controversy. According to reports, in response to the attacks on US troops in Iraq and Syria, Biden personally approved the attack on anti-US militant groups in Iraq.
The report pointed out that the airstrike was in retaliation for the attack on US troops in Iraq by anti-US armed groups. According to a spokesman for the Iraqi armed forces, a drone attacked the international coalition military base at the airport in Erbil, the capital of Iraq's Kurdish autonomous region, injuring three US soldiers, one of whom is in critical condition. In this regard, Biden immediately instructed the US military to fight back.
According to reports, one of the main targets of the US military's air strikes is the headquarters of the Iraqi militia armed movement in the central city of Hilla, in the province of Babylon, Iraq. More than 20 people were injured and one person was killed as a result of the airstrike. A US airstrike caused such a large-scale **, which caused widespread controversy.
The report also revealed that Biden consulted his team during the decision-making process and contacted Secretary of Defense Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Brown Brown. In the end, Biden chose to use force.
However, the airstrike also raised some questions and controversy. First of all, the US military strikes against targets in Iraq did not communicate with Iraq, and in a certain sense, violated Iraq's sovereignty. Iraq** considers the actions of the United States to be hostile and unconstructive, damaging relations between the two countries and seriously violating Iraq's sovereignty.
Second, the U.S. military has repeatedly bombed anti-American militant groups in Iraq and Syria before, but it has not achieved the desired effect and has instead attracted more attacks. The airstrike also raised questions about whether the U.S. military operation was worth it.
In fact, U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria have been frequently attacked recently, resulting in injuries to many U.S. soldiers. In order to protect its own interests and the safety of its soldiers, the United States has chosen to take action in retaliation. However, it remains to be seen whether such actions will actually solve the problem.
Overall, the U.S. airstrikes on anti-American militant groups in Iraq have sparked controversy. On the one hand, the air strikes are in response to the attack on the US forces in Iraq and to safeguard their own interests and the safety of their soldiersOn the other hand, the airstrikes may have violated Iraq's sovereignty, and previous bombing campaigns did not have the desired effect. In the future, how to balance the interests of all parties and resolve disputes still needs further efforts and efforts.
The US air base in Iraq was attacked