Title: C919 production capacity one plane a day?At the end of the day, it turns out that Airbus's "900 Plane Dream" is a bit nonsense!
C919 production capacity, like an upcoming blockbuster, has fallen into a seemingly unsolvable dilemma. Only 150 aircraft can be produced per year, in stark contrast to Airbus' ambitious target of 900 aircraft. What's going on here?Why can't we go up in C919 production?Have we been waiting for the engine?What the hell is this situation, and what are we going to do?
Yes, the C919 capacity problem has always been puzzling. Some people say that we are looking for safety and security, which is why production is so slow. But is that reasonable?Boeing's 737 MAX flies once a day, and our C919 flies every four months, which is inevitably too big. Are you waiting for our own engine?Our engines are indeed cheaper, but do they have to slow down production?
Besides, even if your C919 production is high, can the Geleap-X1C be supplied?Not to mention 300 units a year, even 100 units are a bit hanging. Moreover, the United States will not let its Boeing sink, and the purchase of Airbus aircraft in large quantities is a joke. So, the reality is that no matter how hard you try, you may not be able to reach the level of 900 aircraft a year that Airbus has.
Isn't it a little stuck in the bottleneck of the engine?You see, the LEAP-X1C joint venture, the United States and France, sounds good, and the production capacity is certainly not bad. However, it will take a miracle for CFM Aero Engines to reach the level of 150 C919 aircraft a year. In general, this capacity problem is really complicated, and the seemingly insurmountable difficulty is really embarrassing.
But maybe we can learn something from Boeing. Look, one flight a day, 365 planes a day, 365 planes, is a miracle of production. And, don't forget, Airbus' annual production target of 900 aircraft is also a bit inflated. As far as the Airbus 320 series is concerned, that is, the same aircraft as the C919, do you think 900 is really feasible?If we have been turning a blind eye to the production capacity problem, how can the C919 be able to get up?
Overall, the C919 capacity issue is a real headache. Is it a security issue?Or are you waiting for the engine?Or is it a supply problem?Perhaps the answer lies in this series of questions. It may seem insurmountable, but it is not necessarily completely inexplicable. Perhaps, we need to break some conventions and learn from the experience of Boeing and Airbus in order to find a breakthrough in this dilemma. Otherwise, the production capacity of C919 may become a stumbling block for our country in the field of aviation.
Behind the entanglement of this problem, perhaps we can find some breakthroughs. The production capacity performance of the Boeing 737 MAX and Airbus' annual production target of 900 aircraft are eye-catching, but they also sound the alarm bell of the C919 production capacity problem. Perhaps we need to adjust our mentality, let go of the excessive obsession with "safety and security", and at the same time solve the problem of domestic engines and supply as soon as possible. Boeing's production rate of one aircraft per day and Airbus' annual production target of 900 aircraft may not be able to reach it immediately, but at least we can learn from it and find a path that suits us.
Of course, solving this problem will not happen overnight. Engine capacity, supply issues, safety issues, each of which is a big challenge. But it is these challenges that also give us the opportunity to stand on a higher platform to examine our own shortcomings, so as to better promote the increase of C919 production capacity. Perhaps, this is a moment that requires the joint efforts of the whole industry, not only manufacturers, but also the upstream and downstream of the relevant industrial chain.
In general, the production capacity of C919 is not only a technical problem, but also a management challenge. But we have the strength and ingenuity to solve this problem. Whether it is learning from Boeing Xi learning from Boeing's efficient production experience, or solving engine and supply problems, we need to continue to explore and accumulate experience in practice. I believe that as long as we maintain a positive attitude towards solving the problem, the production capacity problem of C919 will eventually be solved.
Looking back on the full text, we deeply analyzed the complexity of the C919 production capacity problem, and conducted it from multiple dimensions such as safety issues, waiting for domestic engines, and supply problems. By comparing the production capacity targets of Boeing and Airbus, we are deeply aware of the seriousness of the problem. In the end, we pointed out the possible direction of the solution and encouraged all parties to work together to promote the increase of C919 production capacity.
In the title, "C919 production capacity is one plane a day?".At the end of the day, it turns out that Airbus's "900 Plane Dream" is a bit nonsense!"Based on the contradiction of the problem, it arouses the reader's curiosity and desire to think. Through in-depth analysis, questioning and criticism, the full text shows the C919 production capacity problem from multiple angles, and at the same time, through the proposal of solutions, it leaves readers with a positive space for thinking. On the whole, the article not only has a strong emotional color and subjective judgment, but also presents a serious analytical attitude through meticulous **, which meets the requirements of colloquialism.