In today's society, the rise of new energy vehicles has become one of the focuses of global attention. However, some voices hold different views in this field, among which economist Professor Zhang Jie once again criticized new energy vehicles in a recent article, with the title of "Lenovo autonomy, demonizing fuel vehicles, I firmly oppose", expressing strong opposition to the development of this field.
First of all, Professor Zhang Jie questioned the term "associative autonomy". He stressed that whether the so-called autonomy is really independent, he believes that China's fuel vehicles have ushered in a great development on the straight, while some people are overexaggerating the advantages of new energy vehicles, while demonizing traditional fuel vehicles. His point of view advocates that when discussing new energy vehicles, we should avoid blindly exaggerating their advantages, and at the same time, we should not ignore the actual performance of fuel vehicles in specific scenarios.
Professor Zhang raised serious concerns about the capital structure of new energy vehicles. He believes that the capital structure in this field is too complex, and a lot of capital is pouring out, including the possibility of high-level black.
He contrasts this phenomenon with the success of Lenovo in the past, questioning whether Lenovo's success has really brought us more independence, or whether it is simply the destruction of the original independence.
In the article, Professor Zhang also launched a series of attacks against Lenovo. He questioned Lenovo's success, wondering whether Lenovo's rise had actually undermined our independence.
Professor Zhang believes that there are similar activities in the field of new energy vehicles to Lenovo's past thugs, and he urged everyone to understand the motivations behind them to have a clearer understanding of the problems in this field.
However, Professor Zhang's recent remarks seem to be at odds with reality. Recently, there has been news that BYD may enter the field of intelligence and cooperate with Lenovo.
This news quickly aroused Professor Zhang's anger, however, BYD officially clarified that this ** is actually a congratulatory message from Wang Chuanfu to Lenovo New Technology Innovation Conference**, and not a substantive intelligent cooperation content. The incident has once again raised questions about Professor Zhang's remarks, with some accusing him of not being cautious enough in his approach to information.
Netizens also discussed Professor Zhang's views. Some people think that this is outright fake news, pointing out that the Lenovo Technology Conference a few years ago was just a congratulatory message from Wang Chuanfu, and did not involve the cooperation between BYD and Lenovo. Some netizens criticized Professor Zhang for his lack of rigor in handling this information, hyping the old ** as news in 2021.
In the comment area, some netizens pointed out that Professor Zhang's attitude towards new energy vehicles was biased. One of the netizens said that it is a recognized fact that the range extension is only fuel-efficient, and the plug-in hybrid model should be considered for fuel saving.
He believes that different types of vehicles have their own advantages, and there is no need to blindly criticize one over the other. In addition, he mentioned that Professor Zhang's views on economic issues may be influenced by his own financial situation.
Professor Zhang responded to netizens' questions. He emphasized the link of the news on the homepage of Sina News, and believed that the platform was responsible for pushing the news again after a certain manufacturer issued a statement.
He defended the authenticity of the data, pointing out that speeding is the law in China, but vehicles are sold globally and there are no speed limits in different countries.
However, some netizens raised new questions about Professor Zhang's response. It was pointed out that the screenshot of BYD's vehicle speeding was deleted by the platform after the statement was issued, suggesting that there may be information deletion.
This series of controversies has sparked extensive discussions on the development direction of new energy vehicles. On the one hand, Professor Zhang's criticism calls for a more cautious scrutiny of the NEV industry and avoidance of exaggerating its strengths.
On the other hand, netizens raised doubts about his views, believing that his remarks may be influenced by specific backgrounds and interests.
Behind this controversy, it is not only a debate about the development direction of new energy vehicles, but also a discussion about the quality and responsibility of information dissemination. How to maintain authenticity and objectivity in news dissemination and avoid misleading and exaggerating information has become an issue that requires in-depth thinking.
To sum up, the controversy in the field of new energy vehicles is not only a dispute between technology and industry, but also a challenge for information dissemination and guidance. In this era of change, we need to look at the development of emerging industries more rationally and objectively, and at the same time maintain a high degree of vigilance for the authenticity and accuracy of information.