Wu Qianyu and Shi Boxiong's low-key wedding caused a heated discussion on social **. Although some people appreciate their minimalist style, others think that such a move is not in line with the pomp and circumstance of the three generations of wealthy families marrying stars.
At this registration banquet, Wu Qianyu's dress and jewelry appeared a little rudimentary, and the hotel banquet was also controversial, and the cake was small and shabby, far from the traditional pomp and circumstance.
It has been pointed out that this is not a real wedding, but a marriage ceremony. It has been revealed that the marriage process in Hong Kong is different from that in the Mainland, where the marriage application needs to be submitted under the witness of a lawyer and publicized in the lobby for 15 days before the "Certificate of Registrar of Marriages" can be issued, while the actual wedding must be held within 3 months after the certificate is issued.
In fact, the marriage ceremony is just the signing of documents and the exchange of rings in the presence of a lawyer, so that they can legally be considered as a legal couple. This may be one of the reasons why they choose to get married in a low-key manner.
At the same time, Shi Boxiong also said that next year they will hold a bigger wedding abroad.
The wedding may not be traditional, but a playful blend of law and emotion. For Wu Qianyu, the low-key marriage ceremony complements her personality.
* The controversy is actually a collision between the times and tradition. This turmoil has triggered us to think deeply about traditional weddings, and the choice of marriage forms and ceremonies in modern society is becoming more and more diverse, low-key, luxurious, and warm, and everyone's choice has its reasonableness.
This turmoil may help us think about the relationship between wealthy weddings and low-key emotions, and the value of traditional ceremonies in the present. We hope that this low-key marriage ceremony will not only spark controversy, but also serve as a starting point for our diverse thinking about marriage ceremonies.
This turmoil has made us re-examine traditional forms, and it has also touched our human emotions. It allows us to see the conflict and fusion of wealthy weddings with traditional forms, and also makes us think about the significance of traditional ceremonies in modern society.
Perhaps we should be more tolerant of different forms of weddings and re-examine the essence of the ceremony while respecting everyone's choice. Finally, the biggest thought left for us is: how should the form and meaning of the wedding be defined in the collision of times and traditions?