The policy has lowered the cost of water and electricity, but various costs have increased. This is a hot topic on the Internet recently, which has aroused the attention and discussion of many netizens. Everyone said that the direction of the policy may be wrong, and that it is the right thing to do for the hydropower company to implement one meter per household, read the meter to the household, and prohibit the landlord from charging on behalf of the household. Below, I will analyze this issue and give my own opinion.
The current situation is that the water and electricity bills have been reduced through the adjustment of the policy, which is a good thing in itself and meets the expectations of the people. However, with this comes an increase in various fees, which leaves people confused and dissatisfied. In order to solve this problem, many netizens put forward the suggestion of allowing hydropower companies to implement one meter and one household, believing that this can effectively avoid unreasonable increases in fees and make the charges more fair and reasonable.
I couldn't agree more. First of all, the implementation of one meter and one household can reduce the unreasonable**. The current situation is that landlords often collect fees on their behalf, and there are often improper collection behaviors. For example, some landlords will increase the amount of water on their meters to get more money, and these extra costs are not actually used in the daily lives of tenants. If one meter is implemented and each household has its own independent metering equipment, these unreasonable costs can be avoided. Moreover, recharging the prepayment in advance and settling directly with the hydropower company can also make the charges more transparent and fair, and avoid disputes and disputes over the charges.
Secondly, the implementation of one meter and one household is also conducive to promoting resource conservation and environmental protection. In the case of landlord charging, many tenants do not actively use water and electricity resources, reflecting the waste and inefficient use of resources. If each household has independent metering equipment, each household has to pay independently, and the cost is linked to the amount of use, it will promote people to use water and electricity resources more economically, reduce waste, and also play a positive role in the protection of the environment.
Finally, from a legal point of view, the implementation of one meter and one household is in line with the spirit and requirements of the law. According to China's relevant laws and regulations, hydropower companies should charge water and electricity bills fairly and reasonably, and have an effective regulatory mechanism. In the case of landlord charging fees, the implementation of the supervision mechanism will be more difficult, and it is easier to cause unreasonable fees**. Therefore, the implementation of one table and one household can make the supervision mechanism more effective and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the people.
To sum up, the policy has lowered the cost of water and electricity, but various costs have increased. In response to this problem, I support the practice of allowing hydropower companies to implement one meter and one household. In this way, unreasonable costs can be avoided, resource conservation and environmental protection can be promoted, and the requirements of the law can be met. It is hoped that the relevant departments will attach importance to this issue and take positive measures to resolve the concerns of the people. Only through rational policy and system reform can we truly let the masses of the people fully enjoy the dividends of reform and promote social progress and development.