If the same case is heard in your local court, you will lose the case directly, for example, you will have to bear joint and several liability;In a foreign court (usually another province or multiple cities), you will win the case or partially win the case, such as a discharge of liability or joint damages. In this kind of case, if you encounter it, and the favorable verdict corresponds to you, it is your luck, otherwise you are indeed a little unlucky.
In such cases with obvious regionality, for example, in construction projects, the identification of the actual constructor (especially the level of identification);Whether subcontracting and illegal subcontracting are based on invalidity or contractual relativity. In labor disputes, whether it is a one-year statute of limitations for a labor case to determine whether there is an employment relationship or not, or whether it does not follow the understanding that there is no statute of limitations for a lawsuit for confirmation of a civil case. In unjust enrichment cases, the burden of proof is allocated between the parties, especially the strength and order of the initial evidence.
The reason for this situation lies in the fact that the local courts have formed a solidified trial thinking and logic for such cases, that is, they have already set the tone, especially when such cases are often handled locally. In the short term, then, this situation is really difficult to change locally. And if you want to defend your rights, these cases that have been adjudicated before are also a huge obstacle to the revision of your case. Then it is inevitable that your rights protection will go out of the city or even out of the province. However, there is no need to be frustrated, as the rate of reversal of such cases is often relatively higher.