In the long river of history, Pei Ju was a controversial celebrity during the Five Dynasties. He has followed ten emperors and experienced many times of national death, but he has repeatedly stood at the top of the ** and become the ** tumbler. However, whether Pei Ju was a courtier or a courtier, the evaluation of history is different.
Pei Ju's political career has left a strong mark in the 24th history. In the Sui and Tang dynasties, Pei Ju before Pei Ju carried his legendary experience. Pei Ju was born in the Northern Qi clan and was appreciated during the reign of Emperor Wen of Sui and participated in the Battle of Pingchen. However, during the reign of Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty, Pei Ju planned a war against Goguryeo and witnessed the tragedy of the fall of the Sui Dynasty. Despite the fall of the Sui Dynasty, Pei Ju did not die and continued to follow Yu Wenhua in the troubled times. It was not until Li Shimin, the king of Qin, captured Dou Jiande, that Pei Ju surrendered to Tang. He was ordered to advise the soldiers and horses of the East Palace during the change of Xuanwu Gate, showing the flexibility and agility of the best.
However, the "New Tang Book" reveals the two sides of Pei Ju. In the early years of Tang Taizong, Pei Ju bluntly admonished and pointed out Tang Taizong's mistakes. Taizong praised him and thought he was a rare direct minister. However, the Book of Sui criticized Pei Ju's treacherous behavior in the Sui Dynasty, and obtained the best Houlu by flattering Emperor Yang of Sui, which led to the decline of the country. Pei Ju's dedication to the Tang Dynasty was not enough to erase his mistakes in the Sui Dynasty, making his political character highly controversial.
In the evaluation of Pei Ju, Sima Guang made an interesting point. He believed that Pei Ju was a courtier in the Sui Dynasty and a courtier in the Tang Dynasty, and attributed it to the monarch's preference. The reason why Pei Ju was considered a minister was because he conformed to the wishes of the monarch at that time, and in the Tang Dynasty, he conformed to Tang Taizong's preference for listening to different opinions, showing the image of a two-faced person.
There are mixed evaluations of Pei Ju, but his political skills are amazing. Pei Ju is good at greeting and flattering his superiors, and he is a typical minister. In the five dynasties of Feng Dao, although he had no loyalty at all, he was a loyal person, because his loyalty to the imperial power has never changed. The difference is that Pei Ju has always been regarded as a courtier in history, because his political performance always conformed to the political trend of the time, ignoring the country and society, which eventually led to the fall of the Sui Dynasty.
Tang Taizong's commendation of Pei Ju seemed to be praise, but it was actually the biggest humiliation for him. Taizong did not have the magical power to turn the ministers into ministers, and the reason why Pei Ju was commended was only because he skillfully opportunistically favored him, while Taizong took the opportunity to educate the ministers. In Sima Guang's view, the courtier is the shadow of the monarch, the king is loyal, and the king is dark. Pei Ju's duplexity was exposed in front of Ming Jun, and his courtier's nature did not change.
However, there are also people in history who have really turned from the wrong. Lees and Solvay are examples of this. At first, Li Si persuaded Qin II to practice the "art of supervision" for the sake of power, but when the country was in danger, he resolutely exposed Zhao Gao and no longer obeyed the wishes of the second. Su Wei also adopted the strategy of "self-preservation", although at first he met the wishes, but gradually turned from a false to a bad when he felt the danger of the society. These people have been loyal to the country and society behind them, which is in stark contrast to Pei Ju.
Pei's political career has left a complex and multifaceted mark on history. His actions are characterized by both the qualities of a courtier and the heart of loyalty. However, in the troubled times, he chose to follow the wind more often and obtain benefits through flattery. Pei's story makes us think deeply about how people make trade-offs between power and loyalty in the political arena.
Pei's political career presents a typical image of surviving in the political maelstrom, and his actions have both sparked controversy among historians and made people think deeply about the choice between power and loyalty.
First of all, Pei Ju's duality is extremely complex in history. During the Sui Dynasty, he behaved as a traitorous minister, and obtained ** Houlu through flattery, which led to the destruction of the country. However, in the early years of Tang Taizong, he was known for his outspoken advice and won Taizong's appreciation. This kind of duality makes people wonder whether Pei Ju is genuinely thinking about the country, or just catering to the monarch's preferences in different situations. It also raises questions about the true motives of politicians, reflecting the complex and delicate balance between scheming and loyalty.
Second, Pei's political skill and adaptability are breathtaking. He was adept at flattering and flattering his superiors, which enabled him to stand tall in different dynasties. This nimble and shrewd political skill was especially important in troubled times, however, his actions also triggered a series of political consequences that eventually led to the fall of the Sui Dynasty. Pei's story reflects the complexities of the political arena, showing that politicians need to carefully weigh the impact of their actions on the state while chasing power.
There are differences in the evaluation of Pei Ju, Sima Guang believes that he was a courtier in the Sui Dynasty and a courtier in the Tang Dynasty. This point of view makes people wonder whether Pei Ju's behavior is influenced by the current situation, or whether his nature has already included this kind of duality. Sima Guang's argument also reminds us that the performance of politicians in a given context is often influenced by current situations and monarch preferences, which provides a perspective for understanding the complexity of historical periods.
Finally, in stark contrast to Pei Ju are historical figures who have turned from Shen to Sui, such as Li Si and Su Wei. These two politicians chose the path of loyalty to Sheji in the face of the country's peril, thus forming a strong contrast with Pei Ju. Although Pei Ju's political methods allowed him to stand tall in the political arena, they also exposed his compromise and egoism in the pursuit of power.
Overall, Pei's story provides us with a profound historical case for the choices and dangers of political figures in a complex situation. His duplicity provokes reflection on the true motives of politicians, and on how to keep a clear head between intrigue and loyalty. Such historical stories not only help us better understand the past, but also provide useful inspiration for our prudent approach to power and loyalty in today's society.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!