: Last time, we unveiled the veil of the power struggle between Emperor Sima Yan of Jin and King Sima of Qi. Now, we delve into the mystery of Sima You's departure from Beijing, where the story of conspiracy, illness and the succession of the crown prince will unfold.
In 283 AD, Sima Yan issued an edict to annex Jinan County to the Qi State, and at the same time named Sima You's son as the king of Beihai, establishing a series of regulations, including Sima You's privileges to use the "Xuanhang" musical instrument and the Liuyu dance. Yi Cixu couldn't help but wonder, why did Sima You insist on refusing to leave the capital at this juncture?
Sima You has always had a stubborn attitude towards the imperial court, which caused great disgust among the courtiers. In 277 AD, he promulgated a principle that all princes and kings must move to his fiefdoms, but Sima You ignored them. In this struggle for power, Sima Yan undoubtedly showed a resolute attitude towards his younger brother and forced Sima You into a corner.
Sima Yan not only seized Sima You's fief, but also conferred on his sons as the king of Liaodong and the king of Guanghan. This was seen as an obvious provocation to Sima You, but Sima You remained stubbornly in the capital and eventually asked to go to guard the tomb.
The Book of Jin and the Biography of Sima You mentions that Sima You, because of resentment and illness, finally chose to ask to go to the tomb and leave the capital. This decision caused everyone to be puzzled, and Yi Cixu firmly believed that Sima You had deeper considerations in this matter.
In the face of Sima You's request, Sima Yan sent an imperial doctor to diagnose and treat him. The doctors reported that Sima You was in good health, but Yi Cixu speculated that this may be because the courtiers deliberately returned the good news out of fear of Sima Yan and did not dare to offend the imperial power.
The ministers were strongly disgusted by Sima You's stay in Beijing, especially Yang Xiu of the Central Protector Army, Sima Jun of Fufeng, and Yin Xiangxiong of Henan, and the three ministers died of anger because of this. This makes one wonder if Sima You's death triggered the disgust of the courtiers.
The reason why Sima Yan insisted that Sima Zhen be the crown prince may be because Sima Zhen has a smart son, Sima Shu. The future crown prince showed excellent intelligence and became a good spare tire in Sima Yan's eyes.
Why didn't Sima Yan change the prince?Yi Cixu explained that although Sima Cambodia was smart, he had a benevolent personality and was not as witty as Sima Zhen. In addition, changing the crown prince faced huge resistance inside and outside the family, and the cost was high, so Sima Yan did not dare to make a decision easily.
In Sima You's state affairs, the opposition of the courtiers was puzzling. Perhaps Sima You was politically cliqued and selfish, or his existence posed a potential threat to Sima Yan's throne. This history has left many unsolved mysteries and led to endless speculation about Sima You's actions.
At Sima You's insistence, his condition eventually deteriorated, he bid farewell to Sima Yan, and died of vomiting blood two days later at the age of 36. Sima Yan personally presided over the funeral, and Sima You's son Sima Jian became the heir to the crown prince.
The mystery of Sima You's state affairs involves multiple elements such as political intrigue, personal illness, and the succession of the crown prince. The mystery of his departure from Beijing may forever become an unsolved mystery in history, leaving it for future generations to ponder and scrutinize.
The story of Sima You's country is like a painful picture in history, full of power schemes, family feuds and political strife. The article profoundly reveals the fragility of imperial power during the Jin Dynasty and the intrigues within the family in the political struggle.
Sima You's insistence and stubbornness in the article aroused fierce disgust among the courtiers for staying in Beijing. The author analyzes the possibility that Sima You may have formed a political party for personal gain, as well as the potential threat he posed to the imperial court. This interpretation complicates Sima You's actions and leaves history unsolved.
The article gives in-depth thought to the question of why Sima Yan insists on the replacement of the crown prince Sima Zhen. The author believes that although Sima Cambodia was intelligent, his character flaws made him inferior to Sima Zhen in becoming the crown prince. In addition, replacing the crown prince may face resistance from inside and outside the family, and the cost is too high, which makes Sima Yan hesitate at a critical moment. This view takes into account both political realities and reveals the intensity of the power struggle at the time.
The scrutiny of the doctors and the opposition of the courtiers in the article also add a lot to the story. The doctors deliberately reciprocating the good news out of fear of imperial power, and the courtiers dying in anger over Sima You's death, make the story more twisty and dramatic.
The discussion of the prince's puzzle provokes the reader to think about the political mechanism and family power of the Jin Dynasty. The article mentioned that the crown prince Sima Zhen had a smart son Sima Shu, and this "good spare tire" became an important reason why Sima Yan insisted that the prince not be replaced. This political reality gives the reader a clearer understanding of the brutality of the power struggle and the complexity of the imperial succession.
Overall, through an in-depth interpretation of Sima Youzhi's country, the article reveals the complexity of the political struggle and the intrigue within the family during the Jin Dynasty. The power disputes and family emotions in the historical stories, as well as the problems of the succession of the crown prince, have been deeply and carefully analyzed in this commentary**.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!