Today, an old leader of the Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, turned to an analysis article ("The Development Form and Logic of Chinese Enterprises in the Future") on WeChat, combined with the "Dong Yuhui Small Composition" incident, and I conducted in-depth exchanges on several assertions mentioned in the article, and finally concluded that the Chinese enterprises and economic trends reflected behind the "Dong Yuhui" incident are as stated in this article!(This article was originally published in today's headlines "Economic Innovation Essay" and the Observer Network Wind News Forum, and now this article**).
"The Development Form and Logic of Chinese Enterprises in the Future".
Some time ago, Jiapin Economic Development Research Institute and Jiapin Think Tank, at an industry exchange meeting between Chengdu and Chongqing, and more than 10 professional human resources institutions, as well as a number of experts and scholars from university party schools, on the development trend of China's future enterprises, put forward the following views, which caused lively discussions among the participants, and now the corresponding views are shared here for the reference of relevant enterprises and institutions: (data analysis and inference models are omitted here).
First, the "micro-public" tendency of enterprises
Earlier, to accomplish something, there must be a leader, more people in a group, and a business can be set up to complete it. But now, with the diversification of personal professional technology and ability (the development of one specialty or "slash"), as well as the maturity of the whole process or industrial chain support force such as the interconnected service platform or professional auxiliary platform, and the offline assistance platform, one or two people or a few people can achieve the market tasks that can only be achieved by some large and medium-sized enterprises before.
2. Possible new structures
In this context of development, the structure of social enterprises will gradually appear in the form of "dumbbell", with large or super-large enterprises emerging through the continuous merger of various enterprises, and a large number of small and micro enterprises as representatives, individual comprehensive professional or super-professional convergence of "network chain" work groups. Enterprises in the middle state continue to differentiate at both ends, and enterprises with growth prospects, especially some specialized, special and new or specialized, special and new small giant enterprises, are gradually developing towards professional leaders and headsOther medium-sized enterprises are constantly granular and fragmented, scattered into "starry sky - network chain group".
3. The "granular" logic of operation
There are two main driving forces for the gradual granularization and fragmentation of intermediate state enterprises:
First, the continuous diversification, enrichment and proficiency of individual professional technology, as well as the maturity of the whole process or the whole industry chain platform that supports individual technical operation;
Second, individual employees, who were originally disciplined by market culture and social culture as "employees must develop in groups", are increasingly psychologically disgusted with the work and lifestyle driven by the profit-seeking model of large-scale capital, as well as the fallacy of management ability synthesis caused by the "pro-capital" preference of management.
Is this the future of the corporate world?Wait and see. (This article has been authorized by the headline "Economic Innovation Essay"**).