The vast majority of historians believe that the rise of the European powers stemmed from the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution. This view asserts that European civilization developed independently on the basis of inheriting the ancient Greek learning, and has nothing to do with Eastern civilization. However, some have questioned this view, arguing that European civilization was secondary and dependent on the Xi of other civilizations, especially Eastern civilizations.
Secondary development of European civilization.
European civilization is referred to as a secondary civilization, and its rise was relatively late, and even ancient Greece was considered a late generation in front of Chinese civilization. As for the idea of independent development, some people bluntly said to shut up. Europe considers itself the successor of ancient Greek culture, but its place in the overall history has not surpassed that of ancient Greece. This raises questions about the autonomy of European civilization.
Xi from each other in Eurasia.
Europe and Asia are located on the same continent, and learning from each other Xi is inevitable. The author illustrates the exchange of civilizations on the Eurasian continent by comparing the fish ecosystems of large and small lakes. There was the Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road between Eastern and Western civilizations, and nomads also passed on technology and culture in their interactions. This exchange promotes the development of civilization and rejects the idea that Western civilization developed independently.
European studies Xi the inevitability of Eastern civilization.
In ancient times, the Chinese civilization was the most advanced native civilization and had a profound impact on the surrounding areas. The author believes that the advanced status of ancient China shows that Europe, as a backward civilization, will inevitably learn from the advanced civilization Xi. China's lack of documentation of Europe is not due to Europe's independent development, but to the fact that Europe was so backward at the time that it had little impact on the world.
Mutual influence on the Eurasian continent.
There were close exchanges of civilizations on the Eurasian continent, not only the Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road, but also war and prisoners of war as a medium for cultural transmission. Du Huan, an Arab prisoner of war in the Tang Dynasty, was captured in the Battle of Talas and traveled through the Arab Empire for more than ten years, becoming a witness to cultural exchanges. These exchanges allowed Eastern and Western civilizations to inspire each other in terms of technology and culture.
Europe did not develop independently, but was the result of learning from the Orient Xi.
The rise of European civilization did not develop independently, but relied on the influence of Asian civilization. The article points out that Europe is actually only Northwest Asia, and the culture is almost all in Asia, and the religion and ancient Greek culture have been influenced by Asian civilization. China's four great inventions promoted the development of Europe, and Confucianism and Taoism opened the eyes of Europeans. In ancient times, Europe was considered a vassal of Asian civilization, and its rise was achieved by relying on the absorption of Asian culture.
Epilogue. On the Eurasian continent, exchanges and Xi among civilizations are an inseparable part. The rise of European civilization did not develop in isolation, but was achieved under the influence of Asian civilization. Recognizing the interdependence and Xi of civilizations contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of historical and cultural developments.
In the above, the author has conducted an in-depth discussion on the independent development of European civilization and the Xi to Orientalism, revealing the complex historical context behind the rise of European civilization. I believe that this article provides a more comprehensive perspective, both analyzing the questioning of the autonomy of European civilization and emphasizing the interaction and Xi between civilizations in Eurasia.
First of all, the article clarifies the view that European civilization is considered a secondary civilization, and advocates its relatively late status in the long history. This view questions traditional views and provokes deep reflection on the autonomy of European civilization. By comparing Europe's development time and position, the article presents a subversive perspective that challenges the traditional perception of European civilization in the past.
Secondly, through the metaphor of lakes and fish, the article vividly illustrates the mutual exchange and learning Xi civilizations on the Eurasian continent. This metaphor of the ecosystem makes it easier for readers to understand the interaction between civilizations, revealing the positive impact of civilizational exchanges on development. Through historical events and examples, the author highlights the close exchanges that existed on the Eurasian continent and gives a clearer understanding of the reasons for the rise of European civilization.
The article also highlights the status of ancient Chinese civilization and emphasizes the fact that China is the most advanced native civilization. Through the analysis of the influence of ancient China on the surrounding regions, the article shows the dominance of China in ancient civilization and its profound influence on other countries. This provides a strong argument for the inevitability of European Xi to Orientalism later in the article.
Finally, the article deeply analyzes the essence of European civilization, pointing out that in fact Europe is only a vassal of Asian civilization. Through the investigation of European civilization, especially the Asian origin of religion and ancient Greek culture, the article makes it clear that the development of European civilization depends on the absorption of Asian culture. This view has an important enlightening effect on subverting the traditional concept of Europe's independent development.
Overall, this article provides a perspective that is both novel and profound through its historical analysis of European civilization. Through the metaphor of lakes and fish, the emphasis on ancient Chinese civilization, and the revelation of the essence of European civilization, the article leads readers to think about the multi-layered reasons for the rise of European civilization. This holistic perspective helps us to understand the complexity of civilization development more comprehensively, prompting people to think more deeply about history and culture.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!