In the last peace talks of the Ukrainian-Russian conflict, interference from the West led to unsatisfactory results in the negotiations. Although the specifics of the negotiations were not publicly disclosed, Ukrainian negotiators made some details public. The focus of this peace talks is Ukraine's goingMilitaryand neutrality, including non-NATO membership, realization".Finlandization"Statehood as well as limitationsMilitarycapabilities, etc. At that time, the Ukrainian side expressed its willingness to accept these agreements, but in the end they were disrupted by the intervention of Western countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom. In hindsight, Western interference has instead helped Russia achieve even moreMilitaryEarnings.
Ukrainian negotiator Arakamiya said in a Russian RT report that the Ukrainian side will regret not signing a peace agreement with Russia. He said that although it has become difficult to carry out ceasefire negotiations now, it is a pity that the Ukrainian side has not been able to sign an agreement with the Russian side. Lukyanov stressed that the current situation has become relatively simple, and the problem will be resolved on the battlefield, depending on whether the West will be able to learn from the mistakes of the past. This means that the Russian side no longer needs to take into account the acceptance of all sectors of Ukraine, but can put forward conditions according to its own goals. The breakdown of the negotiations allowed Russia to regain more battlefield superiority and strengthen its resolve to win on the battlefield.
Despite the fact that Ukraine has successfully carried out ** in the Kharkiv and Kherson regions, Russia has always held the initiative on the battlefield and has been fighting for more than a yearMilitaryAchieved greater results in the operation. If Ukraine had accepted the terms in the peace deal held last year, Ukraine's losses would not have been as severe as they are today, and Russia would not have been able to reap the huge gains it has today, including its control of territory. Thus, Western interference actually fuels Russia's war momentum.
In the course of the pushback of this negotiation, Russia fromKievThere was a certain demoralization during the withdrawal of troops from the periphery. However, after the overthrow of the peace talks by the Ukrainian authorities, the situation changed noticeably. Not only that, but Russia's resolute determination and desire to win on the battlefield have also made it even more rewardingMilitaryAdvantage. It can be said that the West's move to interfere with Ukraine's abandonment of peace talks has directly helped Russia and allowed it to win on the battlefield.
Although the Ukrainian side gave up the peace talks in the process, Russia has always supported the advancement of the peace talks. However, if the negotiations continue, Russia will demand even more, because it has suffered greater sacrifices at the same time as it has achieved greater results. Therefore, the terms of the peace talks will be different from the previous agreements. Although the Russian side has made it clear that it is ready to continue negotiations, it will only do so on its own terms, and if the other side does not accept it, then the war will continue until the other side accepts. In contrast, the West and Ukraine have shown indecision and lack of firm resolve at this stage. They are all on the fence to continue fighting, however, it is unacceptable to negotiate on the basis of Russia's demands. As a result, Russia has more options and can choose to solve problems on the battlefield.
Looking back at how Western interference in the peace talks has fueled Russia's fighting momentum, I can't help but think about the impact of this interference on both Ukraine and Russia. While Western countries may have taken a pro-Ukrainian stance in the hope of protecting Ukraine's interests by exerting external pressure in the conflict, this intervention has further complicated the conflict. It is precisely because of the interference and interference of Western countries in the peace talks that Ukraine finally abandoned the peace talks and led to the reversal of the situation on the battlefield.
However, from another point of view, Russia's victory on the battlefield did not solve the whole problem of Ukraine. Although inMilitary, but the number of Ukrainian losses and wounded has also increased sharply. This reminds me that peace talks are not necessarily a bad thing in themselves, but the key lies in the conditions of the negotiations and the sincerity of both sides. If the two sides can find a balance in the peace talks and aim for a peaceful settlement, then the situation in this conflict may develop differently.
There is no doubt that the Ukrainian-Russian conflict is a complex geopolitical onePoliticsThe issue involves the interests of many parties and issues left over from history. Resolving this issue requires efforts and compromise on all sides, and the role of Western countries in this should be that of both parties that actively promote peace and reconciliation. Intervening in the conflict will only exacerbate tensions and deepen differences, but will not bring real peace and stability to both sides.
In the future, I would like to see Ukraine and Russia return to the negotiating table to resolve their differences through dialogue and reach a peaceful solution that benefits both sides. The conflict has not only brought great suffering and losses to both countries, but has also posed a threat to the stability and peace of the entire region. It is only through peaceful dialogue that the two sides can find a balance and achieve the goals of long-term peace and development. As a global citizen, each of us should work towards this.