Why does the West accept Ukraine but reject Russia?Deciphering the truth behind the four words!

Mondo Tourism Updated on 2024-01-19

Ukraine and Russia, two former Soviet powers, both doubted their own strength and made overtures to the West after their collapse. But why does the West welcome Ukraine and stay away from Russia?The crux of this question lies in the profound reason behind the four words "self-financed martial arts".

The West greeted Ukraine with enthusiasm: the younger brother of a small country became the best choice.

In the process of joining the West, Ukraine has shown a posture of self-defeat. Ukraine voluntarily gave up its strength with more than a thousand nuclear weapons and turned itself into a small and poor country in Europe. For the West, such a country is tantamount to a little brother who can plunder at any time. Therefore, the West's welcome to Ukraine is not out of genuine friendliness, but more because it has voluntarily weakened its power and become an object that is easy to control.

Russia's conundrum: self-improvement without regrets, the West is intoxicated with staying away.

Unlike Ukraine, Russia, while courting the West, has not voluntarily given up its nuclear arsenal and has not disintegrated itself. During the Yeltsin and Putin eras, Russia made three requests to join NATO, but each time it was rejected by the West. The West does not welcome a strong Russia, because they do not want to adopt a big brother on their doorstep, but prefer to welcome a relatively harmless little brother.

Self-financed martial arts have become an obstacle: Russia's strength is a threat to the West.

Russia, while strong, did not show the same voluntary weakening of power as Ukraine when it joined the West. In the eyes of the West, Russia's accession is not a little brother, but a big brother that may threaten its own interests. Western countries, especially the United States and European countries, have rejected Russia's request to join because of concerns about this potential threat.

Putin's dilemma: self-reliant resistance.

In the face of the West's rejection, Russia can only choose to resist. Under Putin's leadership, Russia must remain strong in response to external pressure. Russia cannot become a friend of the West only until it voluntarily relinquishes its strength. This is also a helpless move by Putin in the international arena, and only by weakening himself can he exchange friendship with the West.

Conclusion: The dilemma of being strong and weak.

In international relations, a strong Russia and a self-defeating Ukraine have shown different destinies. The rejection of the West is not based on a simple measure of national strength, but on balance and stability in the international system. Russia can only be recognized by the West if it becomes relatively harmless on its own. This is a difficult choice for Putin, and it also makes us think deeply about the complex diplomatic relations between countries.

The above article has deeply analyzed the question of why the West is willing to accept Ukraine, but maintains a rejection attitude towards Russia, and reveals the deep reasons through the words "self-financed martial arts". On this basis, I would like to further ** the impact of this phenomenon on international relations and geopolitics.

First of all, the theory of "self-financed martial arts" mentioned in the article actually reflects the complexity of the balance of power between countries. The reason why the West welcomes Ukraine is because Ukraine, when it joined the Western camp, voluntarily gave up its strength and became relatively harmless. This voluntary weakening of power was welcomed as a conformity to Western interests. On the contrary, Russia's strength is seen as a potential threat by the West, so even if Russia expresses its desire to join the West, it is rejected because it has not voluntarily weakened its power.

This phenomenon has raised a question worth pondering in international relations, that is, how can a country gain the trust and acceptance of other countries while maintaining its strength in the process of pursuing its own security and development. In the era of globalization, the interaction of the international community has become more frequent, and the cooperation and conflicts between countries have become more complex. The phenomenon of "self-financed martial arts" mentioned in the article is actually a trade-off between power and soft power by the international community.

Moreover, for Russia, in the face of the rejection of the West, the only option is to remain strong in order to preserve the independence and dignity of the country. Russia is not without a desire to cooperate with the West, but the West's concerns about its great power make cooperation complicated and difficult. It also echoes the realist theory in international relations that state behavior is driven by self-interest, and that competition between great powers is often based on strength.

Finally, the article mentions Putin's stubborn resistance in this context, which also reflects Russia's self-esteem and persistence as a great power. In international relations, the game between major powers is full of complexities and intrigues, and how to seek cooperation while maintaining national dignity has become a difficult problem for Russia's leaders. Putin's choice may not be helpless, but it is also a kind of adherence to Russia's national interests and international status.

On the whole, the phenomenon of "self-financed martial arts" revealed in this article profoundly reflects the complexity of power and power in international politics. As far as the international community is concerned, how to balance the interests and concerns of countries and make cooperation replace confrontation will be an important topic in the development of international relations in the future.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages