Defaults are not uncommon these days, and this is true in every way. Every year, college graduates sign contracts and then break their contracts, even again and again. In view of this, the employer has also learned well and agreed on liquidated damages when signing the contract. Even so, it can't stop college graduates from breaking their contracts.
Unexpectedly, publicly-funded trainees also joined the ranks of breaking the contract. No, Gaozhou City announced a list of 13 graduate students who defaulted on public funds for targeted training at one time. Their graduate schools, majors, and graduation dates are announced one by one. Among them, 5 people directly breached the contract and did not go to work, 7 people served for 1 year, and 1 person served 15 years, while the contract requires six years of service.
The original intention of the government-funded student policy is to help you realize your dream of going to university or graduate school, and you will serve the education cause for a few years after graduation. This is originally a good thing for each to take what they need, get their own convenience, and benefit both parties, but some publicly-funded students default without negotiation, either do not report directly, or change jobs after taking up their posts. People are surprised by this because it is different from the breaking of a tripartite employment agreement.
When signing a tripartite employment agreement, there are indeed objective factors such as insufficient understanding of the employer and conflicts between multiple choices, such as going ashore for the public examination, which are somewhat excusable, but these situations do not exist for public-funded students. The policy has long been issued, and candidates choose not to choose, with enough time to think deeply, and there is no possibility of impulsiveness.
On the one hand, publicly-funded students enjoy state subsidies, on the other hand, they enjoy admission preferences, and after graduation, they are drought and flood guaranteed jobs that others can't ask for, so why break the contract and break the contract with the state? Some people helped these people to relieve the siege, saying that they were too far from home, that the wages were too low, that the environment was not good, and so on. As soon as a discerning person hears it, he knows that this is a substitute explanation, and he uses his own emotions as a reason for others to breach the contract, which cannot withstand scrutiny at all.
First, most of the government-funded students return to their hometowns to work. They sign a service agreement with the education administration of their home country, and after graduation, they return to their home country to work, and it is nonsense that they are too far from home. Even if there are a few students from other places, they know where they are working in advance, so why is it too far away after graduation but not too far when signing a contract? Is it prepared to default when the contract is signed?
Second, the overall income of teachers in various regions is okay. In recent years, all localities have continuously improved the remuneration of teachers to ensure that their salaries are sufficient, and they have done a relatively good job. From a practical point of view, the overall income level of teachers in various places is also reasonable in the local area, not as low as some people say, and they also know it when they sign the contract.
Third, the overall working environment of the school is good。In school, there is not much difference in education between colleagues, the growth environment is roughly the same, and most of them are locals, and they have more common languages. Unlike some enterprises, everyone is a foreigner, and it is difficult to integrate due to the growth environment, values, and living Xi habits.
There is only one real reason for the blatant breach of contract by public scholarship students: there is a better choice.
In today's workplace, most of them are working and watching, while pondering better units and positions. As long as I feel that I have a better option, I will not hesitate to quit my job and change jobs. Man's desires are endless, and it is human nature to look at this mountain and that mountain high, even if he may not be able to climb the mountain he looks up to, he must also try.
The same is true for public-funded students, after graduation or employment, compared with others, especially classmates, this may not be satisfied, that is not satisfied, driven by the psychology of looking upward, so they choose to default, and before the default of the cost of income calculation, the benefits of default outweigh the disadvantages.
In the past, people paid attention to promises, and people did not stand without trust, and the current situation is well known. At the moment when everything is for profit or even mercenary, integrity is not valuable and no one cherishes it. In reality, many strange things have happened, which are basically related to the fact that integrity is no longer valuable.
You see, breach of contract has no binding on re-employment. Isn't it just a notification, the recruitment of many industries and units, the usual practice is to use it when you can see it, and you don't care about the report at all, and you don't even know that there is such a thing. According to the current regulations, personnel relations and archives are not a matter.
The blatant breach of contract by the public-funded students is the result of a game of good faith but not profit. This tells the administrators that it may be necessary to pay attention to the policy of public scholarship students. In the environment of talent marketization, there is a few years between the signing of the agreement and the employment of graduation, and the situation may change greatly, and the room for breach of contract is larger.
Some say that the salary is too low, who will apply? In fact, this is a false proposition, which has been analyzed above, and this is one of them. In the case that college graduates are hard to find jobs and are increasingly inclined to enter the system, open recruitment has its unique advantages, which is the second. In addition, the funds for the training of publicly-funded students can also be used to subsidize the teachers in grassroots schools, so that their salaries will be correspondingly higher.
Netizens, breach of contract is a manifestation of lack of integrity, and in the case of the whole society attaching more and more importance to integrity, breach of contract is not a wise move, and it may not be able to get what you want. It is a question of how to choose between the near and the long term, as can be seen in the shift in the sexual tendencies of the job-seeking community over the decades. I don't know what you think about this, welcome to leave a message to discuss for readers' reference.
This article is the original and first release of Baijia's "Life Lens", and it is not allowed to be carried; This account does not set up an account with the same name or other accounts in other **; The information in the article is from the Internet, if there is anything wrong, please contact to delete).
Refer to the article (you can search and read it on the homepage of this number):
The teacher was sentenced to pay 80,000 yuan for breach of contract and resignation: why take 211 masters, talent introduction, and low salary.
Colleges and universities affiliated to the Ministry in Beijing: How high is the proportion of graduates seeking employment in Beijing?
It is difficult to find employment, go to Hong Kong to find a job: graduates of 12 prestigious universities in the mainland have obtained qualifications!
It is difficult for college graduates to find employment: don't be confused by the current appearance, and only by grasping the essence can we solve it!
Master's degree upside down, academic inflation inflation: how can graduate students find employment is not difficult?