XiaomiYu ChengdongHingesPatentsThe controversy has sparked widespread attention in the industry, and the focus of this controversy is:HuaweiYu ChengdongAt the pollen annual meeting, the problem of plagiarism by friends was mentioned. XiaomiIn the statement it was clarified thatHuaweiof"Double spin water dropletsHinges"withXiaomiof"Keel hinge"It's not the same. Xiaomipointed out that their"Keel hinge"It is a self-developed new generation of folding hinge, withYu ChengdongcalledHingesCompletely different. They appealedYu ChengdongFollow the basic rules of science and rigor and stop misleading the public. Judging by the current situation,Yu ChengdongI'm afraid to worry about this controversy.
AboutHingesPatentsThe controversy that we can contrastXiaomiof"Keel hinge"PatentswithHuaweiof"Double spin water dropletsHingesPatents。AlthoughHuaweiofPatentsThe application date is earlier thanXiaomi, butPatentsThe publication date is much earlier, and the technical characteristics of the two are different. If there really is an infringement problem,HuaweiIt can be lifted directlyPatentsNullity lawsuits, so it can be speculated that there is probably no infringement. Moreover, in terms of time,HuaweiThe dual-spin droplet folding product was launched in February 2021, whileXiaomiThe application for keel shafts was submitted in September 2020. In addition,Xiaomitheirs were mentioned in the responsePatentsIt is multi-shen, including both inventionsPatentsAnd it includes:Utility model patentsHuaweiSimilar technologyPatentsI only applied in October 2021. Therefore, it can be saidXiaomiofPatentsIndependent.
As forHingesThe problem of plagiarism in the form is currently in placeHingesThe shape is basically the same. fromXiaomiwithYu ChengdongThere are differences between the two in terms of design structure, component data and size, but there are some similarities in thinking. There are industry insiders speculating that ifXiaomiofPatentsIt was dug upHuaweipeople made it out, thatHuaweiSimilarPatentswill apply a year later, which showsPatentsThe core research and development is in the hands of this poached person, then thisPatentsIt should belong to him.
However,HingesPatentsThe controversy is that the similarities go back much further, like on the doorHinges。Apply to:Mobile phoneson,MotorolaIn 2016, I applied for a containmentHingesofPatents, which also incorporates a temperature sensor and a heating element, which restores the normal state of the malformed OLED panel by heating.
For this timePatentscontroversy, some industry insiders believe that from the perspective of the market,Xiaomimixfold3HuaweiMATEX5 constitutes a competitive relationship. XiaomiRecently inMobile phonesThe market is doing well, especiallyXiaomi14 sales are good. AlthoughXiaomiNot as good in the high-end marketHuawei, but in the 4k domestic market,XiaomiIt's the second. This givesYu ChengdongA certain amount of pressure. XiaomiThis response is only aimed at"Yu Chengdongand its affiliated companies", does not expand the problem, reasonable, especially the last sentence"Science and rigor are the answersXiaomiIt was mentioned in the published statementHuaweiYu ChengdongMentionedHingesquestion, and saidHuaweiof"Double spin water dropletsHinges"withXiaomiof"Keel hinge"It's not the same.
XiaomiIt is also noted that their"Keel hinge"It is a new generation of folding hinges that have been developed by itself, withYu ChengdongcalledHingesCompletely different. They appealedYu ChengdongFollow the basic rules of science and rigor and stop misleading the public.
According toXiaomiStatement, theirHingesTechnology withHuaweiofHingesAlthough there are certain similarities in morphology, there are differences in design structure, component data, and size. Therefore,XiaomithinkYu ChengdongThe statement is misleading to the public.
In addition,XiaomiIt is also noted that theirHingesPatentsThe application was filed in 2020 and was multi-filed, including both inventionsPatentsAnd it includes:Utility model patents。WhileHuaweiSimilar technologyPatentsI only applied in 2021.
In summary,XiaomiForHuaweiYu ChengdongofHingesPatentsThe controversy was responded to and expressed theirHingesTechnology withHuaweiDifferent, calledYu ChengdongDon't mislead the public. This response may be rightYu ChengdongwithHuaweiCause a certain amount of concern.