XiaomiYu ChengdongwithHuaweiInHingesPatentsThe mutual fear has aroused widespread attention in the industry. The controversy stemmed from:HuaweiYu ChengdongPlagiarism of friends at the pollen annual meetingHuaweiThe statement of intellectual property rights was triggeredXiaomiResponses and clarifications. Xiaomipointed out, keelPivotsYesXiaomiA new generation of self-developed foldingPivotswithYu ChengdongThe so-called "double spinning droplets."Hinges"It's completely different. Compare the two companiesPatents, it can be found that there are differences in the technical characteristics of the two. From the point of view of time,Xiaomi** rod set keelPivotsInHuaweiFold the water dropletsHingesThe application was submitted prior to disclosure. Therefore,XiaomithinkYu ChengdongThe statements do not correspond to the facts, and hopefullyYu ChengdongBe able to follow scientific and rigorous basic rules to avoid misleading the public and discrediting peers.
However, judging by the current situation,Yu ChengdongI may have to sweat for this. HuaweiThe "double spin droplets."HingesPatentsAlthough the filing date is earlierXiaomiThe "keel."PivotsPatents, but the publication date is earlier, and there are differences in technical characteristics between the two. If there is a real infringement,HuaweiIt can be sued directlyPatentsVoid. And in terms of time,HuaweiThe inner fold drop folding product was launched in February 2021 and is relatedPatentsThe application is December 2019, whileXiaomiThe "keel."PivotsPatentsThe application was submitted in September 2020. In addition,Xiaomiwas not mentioned in the responseHuaweiplagiarism, but the focus is onPatentson the difference. Therefore, it is quite possibleHuaweiThere is no infringement, and it isXiaomiOne of the important points of the response.
Judging by the marketing style of the past,Yu ChengdongHe has always emphasized technical suppression and compared himself to his opponents. However, in the present dayHuaweiHaving grown into a recognized domesticated giant, this style may need to change. Now that everyone knowsHuaweiIf you are better than your peers, you don't need to prove it. The situation today is that people are afraidHuaweiEntering an industry, worrying that your market share and interests will be violated. Therefore,HuaweiIt is necessary to converge the edge, empower the industry, and grow together with peers. HuaweiIt is necessary to gain the respect of peers and actively change the market atmosphere that peers are afraid ofHuaweiThe development may be more favorable.
This timeHingesPatentsThe positive effect of the controversy on the industry is to urge more companies to pay attentionPatent protection, innovation andOriginal。Technology and innovation have always been the trump card to win, only pay attentionPatent protectionand innovation, in order to drive the strength and prosperity of the industry. That's a good thing for the industry as a whole.
To sum up, judging from the current situation,XiaomiThe focus of the response is to emphasizePatentsThe difference and chronological order, whileHuaweiThere is a high probability that there is no infringement. At the same time,HuaweiPerhaps you need to change your marketing style, empower the industry, and win the respect and cooperation of your peers. This onePatentsThe controversy has also reminded the industry as a whole of its importancePatent protectionand innovation to drive the development of the industry as a whole. But in the end, it remains to be seen who will win this controversyPatentsThe verdict of the authority and the judgment of the final market.