The reform of public institutions has identified 6 types of teachers as the second category of public welfare, what is the impact on the future?
Career Reform: Does the Identification of Category 6 Teachers as the Second Category of Civil Service Have an Impact on the Future?
Recently, the reform of public institutions has attracted widespread attention, especially teachers, a group with a large base, a wide range and a large number of people. In the latest policy, six types of teachers, including secondary school teachers, colleges and universities, vocational schools, electric universities, kindergartens, and universities for the elderly, will be classified as second-class public welfare institutions.
What is the impact of being recognized as a public welfare second-class professional professor on teaching staff?There is a clear difference between public welfare I and public welfare II colleges. The first-class public welfare institutions are full-funded institutions, while the second-class public welfare institutions are the short-funded institutions. A full grant means that a teacher's income is entirely dependent on the financial allocation and is not affected by the operational efficiency of the institution. Therefore, teachers working in public welfare institutions are equivalent to having a stable one"Iron rice bowl", strong stability and sense of security. On the other hand, teachers working in second-class civil service institutions may face differences in remuneration, which may affect their income and career prospects.
Taking colleges and universities as an example, after the reform of colleges and universities, although colleges and universities continue to retain the attributes of colleges and universities, the professional identity of college teachers will no longer exist. Future university professors will be transformed into contract workers. As contract workers, teachers with excellent performance may receive high salaries, but teachers with poor teaching and research performance may face the risk of dismissal after the expiration of their contracts, and their professional stability and sense of security will be much weaker than that of staff in public institutions.
While high schools and universities have been classified as Category 2 public services, some observations suggest that primary and secondary schools retain their status as Category 1 public services. In short, primary and secondary school teachers, because of the nature of their schools as a class of public service institutions, are less affected by the drawbacks of institutional reform than some secondary school and university teachers.
The reason for this phenomenon is that primary and lower secondary education is classified as"Compulsory education"。The definition of public welfare institutions clearly points out that public welfare institutions, that is, fully funded public institutions, are public institutions that provide basic public services such as compulsory education, basic scientific research, public culture, public health, and basic medical care for the grassroots level. From this point of view, primary and junior high schools are part of the basic public service that must be provided. And the work of primary and secondary school teachers is more secure.
What are your thoughts on this?The author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The data and theories in this article are based on Internet materials, which does not mean that the author agrees with the truthfulness of the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors or information contained in this article. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems caused by the above content or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility.