There is no China after Yashan?Reveal the secret of the Song Dynasty etiquette dispute, the origin of kneeling in the north and the south.
In the second year of Xiangxing (1279 AD), the Southern Song Dynasty was destroyed in the Battle of Yashan, and the prime minister Lu Xiufu committed suicide by throwing himself into the sea, symbolizing the extinction of the Zhao and Song emperors. However, the statement that "there is no China after Yashan" is not a historical truth, but a poem by the traitor Qian Qianyi in the late Ming Dynasty.
Song Li: The cultural difference of only kneeling.
During the Song Dynasty, due to the prevalence of tall seating, the original etiquette system was challenged. In order to avoid the formation of a situation in which the seater is high and the kneeling person bows his head, the Song people began to advocate the etiquette of "only kneeling but not kneeling". Even when the emperor meets his subordinates, he only needs to make a bow, not kneel and kowtow. This cultural tradition continued into the Ming Dynasty, becoming the only dynasty in Chinese history where knees did not have to be in close contact with the ground.
Kneeling in the North and Kneeling in the South: The Cause of the Ritual Controversy.
The Mongols in the north did not always have a tradition of bowing down, but under the impetus of Yelu Chucai, it became a regular system. In order to consolidate his rule, Ögedei designated three kneeling and nine bows as the Great Khan's greeting ceremony and made it mandatory. This made the Southern Song Dynasty after the fall of the Southern Song Dynasty, the southern people also had to bow down under the rule of the Mongols, which became a ceremonial dispute that lasted for nearly 70 years, forming a situation of "the south knelt and the north knelt".
Zhu Yuanzhang's Reform: An Effort to De-Mongolianize.
After Zhu Yuanzhang overthrew Mongol rule, he took a series of measures to restore Chinese etiquette culture. He stipulated that the clothing should be "redressed like the Tang system", forbade the surname Hu, strictly prohibited the Hu language, and also banned the step-marriage system prevailing among the grassland peoples. These measures are aimed at abandoning the influence of Mongolization and returning to traditional Chinese culture.
Conclusion: Historical Analysis of the Kneeling in the North and the South.
"There is no China after Yashan" has caused some controversy in history, but it is actually an exaggeration. China's 5,000-year-old civilization has not been wiped out by momentary ceremonial disputes. The historical analysis of the ritual dispute in the Song Dynasty allows us to better understand this embarrassing historical fragment.
The Dispute over Etiquette in the Song Dynasty: A Historical Analysis of the Kneeling in the North and the South" vividly restores the background and influence of the ritual dispute in the Song Dynasty, and profoundly explains the ins and outs of the remark that "there is no China after Yashan". Through detailed historical research, this article clearly presents the collision of cultural differences and etiquette traditions between the north and the south at that time, and highlights the efforts of de-Mongolianization during the Zhu Yuanzhang period. Here are some comments and reflections on the article.
First of all, the article mentions that the statement "there is no China after Yashan" is a poem by the traitor Qian Qianyi in the late Ming Dynasty, emphasizing the exaggerated nature of this statement. By revealing the truth behind the statements, readers are better able to understand historical events and avoid being misled by exaggerated rhetoric. This method of discerning historical discourse is very enlightening to the reader.
Secondly, the article explains in detail the reasons for the etiquette controversy in the Song Dynasty, especially the etiquette of "only kneeling and not kneeling" in the south, which is in stark contrast to the tradition of "three kneeling and nine knocking" practiced by the Mongols in the north. This cultural difference is not only a difference in etiquette, but also reflects the difference in culture and social system between the north and the south. This multi-angle interpretation of historical events provides readers with a richer understanding.
In addition, the article introduces the reforms of Zhu Yuanzhang's period, highlighting his efforts to de-Mongolianize. This period played a positive role in promoting the recovery and development of Chinese culture. By clearly pointing out the direction of Zhu Yuanzhang's reform, the article gives readers a deeper understanding of the complexity and challenges of this historical period.
Finally, the article also summarizes the historical analysis of "kneeling in the north and kneeling in the south". By highlighting the resilience of China's 5,000-year-old civilization, it emphasizes that the ceremonial controversy has not affected the fundamentals of Chinese civilization. This kind of profound thinking about history has made people better understand that history is a complex and changeable process, and that the specific circumstances of one period should not be simply applied to the entire historical process.
To sum up, this article presents a clear historical picture for readers through the in-depth discussion of the etiquette dispute in the Song Dynasty. Through detailed historical evidence and clear logical structure, readers can better understand the social and cultural background at that time, and also provide useful inspiration for us to better understand and inherit Chinese civilization today.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!