Many people condemned the school and the principal in a righteous and stern tone, accusing the principal of lacking humanity and criticizing the lack of warmth, and even demanded an investigation of the principal and called for the dismissal of the principal.
In fact, the sight of students waiting in the rain for the school to open in the rain is really painful. From a common sense point of view, the school's practice of not opening the door early to let students in is indeed impersonal, and should be criticized, and the principal should be held responsible.
Society doesn't always work according to common sense. Things often have antecedents and consequences. Not opening schools early is just a result, and there must be a reason behind it. When we look at a problem, we can't just look at the effect and ignore the cause.
What is the reason why schools do not open early?I'm sure everyone should know that. If the school wasn't considered an unlimited liability company, how could it have made such impersonal rulesTherefore, if you want to blame, you should blame those who judge in the mud.
It is not said that some parents are to blame, because there is nothing wrong with parents making demands, which can be seen as a kind of bargaining. Parents can make a variety of requests, and the referee should decide whether to agree to them based on the facts. However, in reality, sometimes the referee cannot make a fair decision on who is loud and reasonable.
Human nature exists, but in the referee's mud, it gradually becomes exhausted. Therefore, no one should criticize the school, including the superiors.
When schools recognize that they must be responsible for any accidents that occur in schools, they will take proactive measures to avoid risks. Organizations are ultimately governed by people, and people instinctively seek advantage over harm. This is a common phenomenon.
Those who criticize the school and the principal often just stand on the moral high ground and say a few words of benevolence and morality. But if they are in the same situation, it is likely that they will also prioritize protecting themselves. Even critics like Bai Yansong inevitably think of their own interests first.
Saying "people-oriented" sounds great, but once things go wrong, it's easy to throw it away. The responsibility on the principal is heavy, so they are bound to be careful. Especially in the case of a major accident, the problem is not just a personal problem for the principal.
If the referee does not act according to common sense, the school can only take a more conservative approach. This is just like whether to help or not in society, if you may be implicated, then simply do not help. Since early entry can lead to problems and the school is responsible for it, it is simply not allowed to enter the school early.
In fact, there are many similar problems in the field of education, not only not opening the doors early on rainy days, but also not allowing students to go out during recess, not attending physical education classes, or not allowing slightly dangerous activities, etc.
The emergence of these seemingly unreasonable and strange problems is mainly due to the referee's attitude towards the mud. One unjust verdict can have consequences even more than ten crimes. It is precisely because of the ruling that the mud has led to all kinds of strange phenomena across the country, including the fact that schools do not open early.
Such a situation may exist only in our country. To truly solve this problem, it is necessary for the upper leadership to unshackle the school and establish a clear rule: if you arrive at school early, you will bear the consequences of accidents. I wonder if the upper leadership would dare to put forward such a provision?It is also unclear whether parents will agree to such a rule.