Yongzheng Dynasty, a confusing chapter in the long history, and the most eye-catching of them is the plot of "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" in the TV series "Yongzheng Dynasty". However, what is surprising is that this episode did not happen at all in real history. This article will deeply analyze the difference between real history and film and television fiction, and restore the truth of the conspiracy in the Yongzheng period.
In the TV series, the Eight Masters seem to have been disgruntled and tried their best to be the enemy of Yongzheng. However, real history tells us that since the moment Yongzheng ascended the throne, he has already grasped the military power of the Qing Dynasty. The so-called "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" plot in the TV series is actually a fictional conspiracy drama. Although a series of reforms promoted by Yongzheng, such as the integration of officials and gentry, directly touched the interests of the children of the Eight Banners of Manchuria, the attempt of the Eight Masters Party came to naught in reality.
Conspiracy interpretation: "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" in the TV series
In the TV series, "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" becomes the climax of a fascinating story. The Eight Masters Party united with the Eight Banner Banners, pretended to pass on the holy decree to grasp the military power of the Fengtai Battalion and the Xishan Ruijian Battalion, and colluded with Long Keduo, the Minister of the Guard, in an attempt to regain control of the government through the "Eight Kings Discussion". Above the court, the Eight Masters Party was pressing forward step by step, and Yongzheng was outnumbered and in trouble. However, the appearance of the Thirteenth Master stabilized the situation, and in the end, the Eighth Master Party was defeated one after another, leaving behind the arrogance of "Brothers are waiting for you to kill".
True History: The Qing Dynasty's "Council of Ministers".
In real history, there is indeed a "Council of Ministers", but it is fundamentally different from the fictional plot in the TV series. In the 43rd year of Wanli, after Nurhachi established the Eight Banners system, he set up five ministers and ten ministers to jointly consult on national affairs. In March of the seventh year of the Mandate of Heaven, Nurha's red edict ordered Baylor, the owner of the Eight Banners, to discuss state affairs, forming the prototype of the "Council of Ministers of the King of Parliament". After Huang Taiji became emperor, the number and functions of the ministers gradually expanded, forming a pattern of joint discussion between the nobles of the clan and the Eight Banners Gushan Ezhen.
The Evolution of Power Schemes: The Separation of Power and the Struggle for Imperial Power.
However, the Council of Ministers had an inherent flaw, that is, it dispersed imperial power. During the period when the Qing Dynasty was growing in national power, the scenario of "three stinkers racing Zhuge Liang" gradually became no longer applicable. During the Kangxi period, the South Study gradually replaced the status of the "Council of Ministers of the King of Parliament", and in the Yongzheng period, the "Council of Ministers of the King of Parliament" almost existed in name only, and lost its actual control over the government.
The pinnacle of conspiracy: Yongzheng's conspiracy is revealed.
After Yongzheng ascended the throne, the distribution of the Eight Banners Army made him directly control the Five Banners Army, and the remaining four banners were led by the eight princes. The power of the Eight Masters Party gradually declined with the dismissal of Prince Yu, and Yongzheng actually directly controlled the Five Banners Army. In this case, the Eight Masters Party has lost the power to fight back and has become a lamb to be slaughtered in the hands of Yongzheng.
Historical truth: the impossible "Eight Kings forced the palace".
Based on the understanding of real history, we can make it clear that the dramatic event of "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" did not occur during the Yongzheng period. Yongzheng was a very scheming and intelligent emperor, and his strong control of power made it impossible for the Eight Masters to find an opportunity to resist. After Yongzheng ascended the throne, the suppression of the Eight Masters made them vulnerable and could not form enough threats in the court.
In real history, Yongzheng achieved direct control of the Eight Banners Army through ingenious tactics, and completely broke the power base of the Eight Masters Party. Therefore, the plot of "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" in the TV series is purely fictional and an imagination of historical truth.
Conclusion: Unveil the veil of history and recognize the real Yongzheng era.
Through the comparison of history and TV dramas, we can have a clearer understanding of the political pattern and the evolution of power and conspiracy in the Yongzheng period. Although the TV series provides the audience with a thrilling plot of power schemes, the real history is richer and more complex. Through an in-depth understanding of the intrigues and changes in the Yongzheng era, we can more comprehensively understand the rise and fall of the Qing Dynasty, unveil the veil of history, and restore the real Yongzheng era.
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the plot of "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" in the TV series "Yongzheng Dynasty", revealing the difference between the plot and real history. Through the comparison of history and film and television plots, the author vividly presents the political pattern and the evolution of power and conspiracy in the Yongzheng period, and profoundly points out the fiction of history in the TV series.
First of all, the article begins with an eye-catching title, clearly pointing out words such as "the truth of the Qing Dynasty" and "Yongzheng power plot revealed", so that readers have a strong interest in the topic of the article. This headline technique is especially popular in the current information age, and has successfully led readers to read deeply.
Secondly, the article vividly describes the plot in the TV series, such as "the Eighth Master Party is pressing step by step", "The appearance of the Thirteenth Master stabilizes the situation", etc., which increases the readability of the article. Through such descriptions, it is easier for readers to devote themselves to the power struggle of that era in their imagination and feel the weight and drama of history.
Then, the article cleverly contrasts the differences between the fictional plot in the TV series and real history, emphasizing that the "Eight Kings Forcing the Palace" is impossible to happen in real history. Through detailed historical records, readers can more clearly understand the changes in the Yongzheng period, and recognize the differences between the dramatic arrangement of the TV series and the real history.
When discussing the historical background, the article clearly mentions the "Council of Ministers of the Council of Ministers" and its existing shortcomings, and through the analysis of the Qing Dynasty's government system, readers can better understand the ins and outs of the power struggle. At the same time, the distribution of the Eight Banners Army and the fate of the Eight Masters during the Yongzheng period were explained in detail, highlighting the clever strategy of Yongzheng in the power struggle.
Finally, the article cleverly combines the difference between fiction and real history in TV dramas, and summarizes the rational cognition of history: "The plot of 'Eight Kings Forcing the Palace' in the TV series is purely fictional, and it is an imagination of historical truth. This kind of objective and rational summary enables readers to deeply understand the difference between film and television works and real history while enjoying the plot.
Overall, this review is rich in content and clear in discussion, and through the comparative analysis of TV dramas and history, it successfully guides readers to think about and deeply understand the political changes in the Yongzheng period.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!