When Li Zhi, an associate professor at Peking University, entered the campus, he faced a ridiculous dilemma: he was chased by security guards. At first, the security guard ran and chased, but then simply rode a bicycle to chase after him, and it was not until Li Zhi showed his work card that the security guard reluctantly left. This scene is unbelievable, a professor with a reputation at Peking University has to cross over the gate as if he has crossed the gate of the school, and is even suspected of being a dangerous element by the security guards.
However, the reason for this tragicomedy is that Peking University now uses a facial recognition system, and Li Zhi does not authorize the school to use his facial information and cannot perform facial recognition. Unable to pass through the facial recognition system, he had to stay under the scrutiny of the guards every time he entered and exited the campus with his work card. For Li Zhi, personal facial information is privacy, and he thinks why he has to expose his personal privacy in front of everyone
Therefore, in order to avoid this tedious step, Professor Li Zhi often stepped straight over the railing to enter the campus. However, many netizens expressed some doubts and criticisms about this. They believe that as a professor, Li Zhi should have noble qualities and qualities and know how to abide by rules and regulations. Facial recognition is used to ensure the safety of the campus and maintain the order of the school Xi, after all, the school is not a park, but a place to learn Xi.
From a school management point of view, it is indeed necessary for universities to adhere to rules and regulations. However, we should also not forget the nature of the university as a public space, and the university should be a place without a gate. The reality, however, is that universities are becoming increasingly closed. Although some universities have begun to open up under some public outcry, this opening is still conditional and not completely opened.
Peking University and Tsinghua University, for example, claim to have opened their doors to the outside world, but in fact they still impose a series of restrictions. They only allow the community to make an appointment for a visit, but after making an appointment to enter the campus, it has to go through a variety of complex vetting and verification processes before it can be considered a "visit". This openness is a far cry from the true openness of our hearts.
The university is supposed to be an accessible place of learning and Xi, accessible to everyone as long as they so wish, and to freely exchange information and resources with the school. However, university openings are now extremely restricted, which has sparked public discontent. Despite the security implications of Open Universities, most universities around the world are open, so why should we be so careful about universities?
If there is a real security issue to consider, we can take a detailed management plan, such as setting up access control in key places such as teaching buildings, laboratories, libraries, canteens, etc., to prevent outsiders from entering and ensure that the Xi and life of teachers and students are not disturbed. Compared with public places such as shopping malls, residential areas and parks, there are relatively few universities, and safety issues should be manageable. If other public places can do this, why can't universities?
The openness of universities does not mean a rambling laissez-faire. Reasonable openness can facilitate the flow of information and resources, which will be of great benefit to the development and growth of universities. Therefore, security concerns should not be an excuse to restrict the opening of universities. We can maintain the order and safety of teaching by establishing a refined management system, rather than closing the door.
In July this year, the Ministry of Education issued a notice to encourage universities, high-tech enterprises, and manufacturing enterprises to open their doors to the public and take the initiative to serve the whole people's Xi. As a social resource, it is natural that schools should give back to society. At the same time, it is necessary for the physical space of the university to be open to the public, which is the responsibility of the university to "serve the society".
Therefore, Professor Li Zhi's refusal to cooperate with the school's punch-in system on the grounds of maintaining personal privacy essentially implies that the university is not open**, which is commendable. As a reader, what do you think about the situation when Li Zhi, an associate professor at Peking University, was chased by security guards when he entered the campus?Welcome to leave a message to discuss.
This article takes the plot of Li Zhi, an associate professor at Peking University, who was chased by security guards when he entered the campus, as the starting point, and discusses the issue of university opening and security. The article points out that although it is important to ensure campus safety and order Xi from the perspective of school management, universities should be open as public spaces, but in reality they are showing a trend of becoming more and more closed. As for the restrictions and security issues of university opening, the article argues that a balance can be achieved through a meticulous management plan to avoid excessive restrictions on opening. Finally, the article praised Professor Li Zhi's refusal to cooperate with the school's punch-in system.