In the American political arena, an unusual craze is heating up ahead of schedule. Although there is still some time before the next ** election, the atmosphere of the election campaign has already begun to heat up. Behind this phenomenon is the existence of Trump's variable. His refusal to accept defeat in the 2020 election, and the storming of Congress by his supporters were seen as a crisis in American constitutional history.
Now, Trump is ready to run again in 2024***, which has led to a sharp rise in the attention of the election. He used the heat to quickly gain a lot of support and became the candidate with the highest support rating within the Republican Party. The Democrats' multiple lawsuits against him have instead led him to claim that he is a victim of political **, which has also won him the hearts of more supporters.
U.S. allies and adversaries around the world are watching Trump's possible return to the White House, especially U.S. allies. An analysis in Wall Street noted that allies are concerned that Trump could return to his foreign policy under the administration, damage relations with allies and unleash a global warAt the same time, his return to power could bring benefits to countries such as China and Russia.
However, this explanation ignores the complexities of politics. Trump's policies will not simply favor China and Russia, and he may take more aggressive measures than Biden**. There is no essential difference between Trump and Biden in terms of anti-China and anti-Russia, only the means and intensity are different. Even if Trump is re-elected, China and Russia will need to be prepared for changes in U.S. policy.
Wall Street**" reporting could be a political ploy to create a battlefield for 2024 by clipping historical events. This kind of competition has already appeared in the 2020 election, where Republicans and Democrats compare each other to see who has a tougher stance on China. 2024** in the United States may become an arena for "anti-Sino-Russian" competition.
On the other end of international politics, North Korea's nuclear strike Xi has raised concerns. North Korea conducted launch drills that simulated a nuclear tactical attack, demonstrating the flexibility and technological progress of its nuclear strike capabilities. The Xi exercise was a response to U.S.-South Korean military Xi, demonstrating North Korea's ability to break through defenses and deliver a nuclear strike.
The United States and South Korea must take North Korea's message seriously to reduce nuclear deterrence on the peninsula in order to reduce tensions. At the same time, China and Japan have a dispute at the WTO over the Fukushima nuclear sewage discharge issue, which reflects the trend of international politicization. China's suspension of imports of Japanese seafood is a normal move for security reasons, but Japan has escalated the issue to the WTO in an attempt to resolve the dispute through political means. Such an approach could exacerbate tensions in international relations.