Farmers get a pension, how much does the expert recommend is appropriate?Hear what the experts have to say
In recent years, the call for the reform of the rural pension insurance system has become louder and louder. In our country, peasants are the main body of our country's agriculture, and they work hard and exchange their labor for a large amount of food. However, the vast number of rural residents in our country have a relatively large social burden, and at the same time, there are also great economic difficulties. Therefore, whether or not to pay pensions to peasants has become the focus of controversy.
There is disagreement among scholars about whether pensions should be paid to peasants. Some scholars have proposed that endowment insurance should be regarded as a necessary social insurance system that can ensure their survival. They suggested that the amount of pensions should be the same as that of municipal employees in order to ensure fairness and fairness. In addition, through the payment of pensions, more farmers are encouraged to participate in agriculture, and the output of agricultural products is increased, so as to promote the development of rural areas.
However, there are also experts who are skeptical about the payment of pensions to farmers. They argue that the issuance of pensions to rural areas will increase the financial burden of the first and cause injustice. They fear that many young people will quit the land early after receiving their pensions, thus reducing agricultural productivity. At the same time, the article also believes that due to the characteristics of the peasant households, their main economy is not only limited to the production of agricultural products, but also includes land circulation and animal husbandry. The payment of pensions may lead to a decrease in the motivation of rural households, thus affecting their motivation for economic development.
On the basis of soliciting opinions from all parties, the author proposes that the reform of the rural pension insurance system is imperative, but corresponding arrangements should be made according to specific national conditions. First of all, the amount of pension should be commensurate with the local financial situation and the general income of rural households. There is a big gap in the wage level between various localities, so it is necessary to adapt measures to local conditions, so that old-age insurance can truly become the basic living guarantee of rural residents.
Secondly, the pension should be linked to the contribution and length of service of the insured rural households. In this way, it is possible to motivate farmers and gradually increase their pensions. It can also prevent some peasant households from living only on pensions and are unwilling to do farm work.
In addition, the improvement of the pension insurance system must also have corresponding policy support. For example, it is necessary to further improve China's social insurance system, expand the coverage of medical insurance and old-age insurance, and enable peasants to enjoy comprehensive social security. At the same time, it is necessary to intensify professional training for peasant households, enhance their employability, increase their economic income, and enable them to have more room for work and development after leaving the rural areas.
On the whole, the implementation of the peasant pension system is an effective measure. However, the establishment of the endowment insurance system should not only take into account the financial pressure of the country, but also consider the actual needs of rural households. In order to ensure that migrant workers can receive effective protection and support, it is necessary to carry out scientific planning and decision-making, so as to promote the development of rural economy and social justice.