The reform of the rural general election method is no longer determined by the votes of the villagers, and the reasons are analyzed in depth!
Reform of the rural general elections is imminent. The state has made it clear that the reform of rural general elections will no longer be based solely on deciding the votes of villagers. In response to this major change, many villagers have a lot of discussions. The following article will focus on this topic, the pros and cons of state interference in local elections.
1) The current situation of the general election of village cadres.
With the continuous development of rural areas and the continuous strengthening of the country, most villages have ushered in opportunities for their own development. At present, there are many funds and projects involved in the village. Therefore, there are some village cadres who have seen it"Scoop up oil and water"opportunity to take advantage of the opportunity to make a windfall.
In the case of profits, some people will naturally participate in some small actions at the grassroots level in order to become village cadres. For example, by bribing villagers to affect the fairness and justice of the election, and even in order to be elected, some people are involved in crime and evil. These practices have greatly undermined the fairness and impartiality of the rural general elections. It is precisely because of the existence of these undesirable phenomena that the state has made up its mind to carry out reforms in the rural general elections.
ii Reasons for the State's involvement in rural areas**.
1) Ensure fair elections. As we mentioned earlier, some people want to become village cadres through bribery for personal gain. Then use the power in their hands for personal gain. This kind of behavior must be severely cracked down. At this point, the intervention of the state can reduce the outcome of these improper elections and ensure the fairness of the final elections.
2) Establish an effective mechanism for general elections in rural areas. The rural world has been developing for many years. However, the change in the rural world has only happened in so many years. The reason for this may be clear to everyone. If there are no good staff in the village, no good policies, it will be difficult for the rural world to change. Therefore, the transformation of the rural areas must be carried out in an all-round way. As we have already said, village cadres are the key to the development of the village, so it is very important to conduct an effective general election. When we can establish an effective and perfect election mechanism, we will be able to elect better village cadres for the villagers.
3.Blows"Corruption in the countryside"。If it is said"Tigers"Damn, then"Flies"Equally harmful. In rural areas, many residents work directly with village cadres and put forward their own demands. At this time, how well the village cadres play is directly related to the image of the village cadres in the hearts of the villagers. Peasants don't like village cadres, often because of some"Village officials are corrupt"negative effects. These people should be severely punished.
iii.What are the benefits of interfering in rural elections?
Undoubtedly, there are many benefits to doing so. Basically, there are the following aspects:
1.The election was fair, just and open. All villagers want their villages to get better and better, and naturally they also like to elect good village cadres. However, if there is no supervision and restraint, it is not certain whether or not good village cadres can be selected in the end. In this case, only the intervention of the state can promote the fairness of the elections.
2.The overall quality of the village committees has improved. As a matter of fact, after so many years of development, many people will clearly feel that the overall quality of the staff of the village committee has been greatly improved. In fact, this is the effect of supervision. In addition to the supervision of the staff, the villagers are far less aware of a person's background than the state.
iv Rural development under regulation and autonomy.
The countryside is the smallest unit of mass self-government. Autonomy, simply put, is self-management. If we say that we completely ignore the rural areas and let the rural areas develop on their own, many problems will certainly arise. These problems can greatly harm the vital interests of the villagers. In such a situation, the state, through the necessary supervision, can prevent the development of the countryside from deviating from the right direction. Therefore, the development of rural areas is undoubtedly inseparable from regulation, and autonomy is equally necessary. Only the perfect combination of the two can be more conducive to the development of rural areas.
Summary. The participation of the State in the election of village cadres is indeed a very necessary measure aimed at realizing the principles of fairness, justice and openness in the process of rural self-government. This initiative will enable the villages to elect more competent cadres.