The irrational income of village cadres has always been a question in the minds of the peasants and a problem that is difficult to solve. Although according to the provisions of the Villagers' Autonomy Law, village cadres are elected by voting of all villagers and should theoretically be the most trusted people of the villagers, the villagers are full of doubts and doubts about the behavior of village cadres, especially economic issues.
The so-called unreasonable income refers to the part of the income obtained by village cadres during their tenure in excess of their normal wages. So, where does the unreasonable income of village cadres come from?An incumbent village cadre told me that there are three main reasons: the lack of transparency in village-level management, the selfishness of some village cadres, and the mistakes in the general election of village cadres.
First, the lack of transparency in village-level management is one of the main factors that raises doubts. In the past, due to the non-standard management at the village level, the village affairs work was chaotic, resulting in unclear accounts, loopholes and suspicious points, and even the problem of corruption. However, there has been a significant change in management at the village level. The legal system is clear, the management is in place, the responsibilities of village affairs are clear, and the accounts are clear, which is very different from the past. However, there are still some village cadres who are lazy, and once the task is completed, they do not announce the relevant details and processes to the villagers, nor do they transparently publicize the relevant accounts in a timely manner, which leads to misunderstandings among the villagers.
Second, some village cadres have selfish motives. In the course of their work, some cadres may pursue their own interests and seek to gain a small advantage in the course of performing their duties. However, the current rural village-level management system does not work for the vision of these selfish village cadres. Under the current village-level management system, as long as the principles are adhered to and the system is strictly enforced, there will be no economic loopholes and the selfish desires of a small number of village cadres cannot be satisfied.
Finally, there may be mistakes in the process of the general election of village cadres. If there is a mistake in the general election, it is possible to allow some people who lack a political bottom line and moral flaws to enter the leading group of village cadres, which is contrary to the principle of election. However, as the first person responsible for the election, the secretary of the township party committee should be responsible for the entire election process to ensure the fairness and legitimacy of the election. Every village-level election is solemn and prudent, and it is almost impossible for unqualified, selfish, and morally flawed people to smoothly enter the village cadre team, and even if a few people get in, they will be quickly discovered and cleared out of the village cadre organization.
To sum up, the peasants' doubts about the unreasonable income of village cadres mainly come from the opacity of village-level management, the selfishness of some village cadres, and the mistakes in the general election of village cadres. However, the current village-level management system has been strictly regulated, which is very different from the past, so that the gray income problem exists very little, if not almost non-existent. Even if it does, it will be dealt with fairly in a timely manner. Therefore, all villagers should be vigilant and pay attention to the discovery and reflection of problems at any time, so that there is nowhere to hide illegal acts, and ensure the transparency and fairness of village-level management.
As a self-editor, I have conducted in-depth thinking and research on the problem of unreasonable income of rural village cadres. Through exchanges and research with many village cadres, I believe that although the problem of unreasonable income of village cadres exists, it has been effectively controlled and regulated under the current village-level management system.
First of all, modern rural village-level management has undergone tremendous changes. Compared with more than 10 years ago, the training and selection mechanism for rural village cadres has been improved, and the management system has become more standardized. At present, village-level management is very strict, and the implementation of various systems and norms has effectively constrained the behavior of village cadres, making it difficult for them to become corrupt and obtain improper income.
Second, the village cadre election system with the participation of the whole people provides villagers with the right to choose. The Villagers' Autonomy Law stipulates that village cadres must be elected by voting of all villagers, which gives villagers the opportunity to participate and supervise directly. At the same time, the secretaries of township and town party committees, as the first persons responsible for the election, must also conscientiously perform their duties to ensure the fairness and legality of the election. Such an electoral system provides a solid guarantee to prevent unqualified and problematic people from entering the village cadre team, and further reduces the potential problem of gray income.
Thirdly, the progress of informatization and transparency has made village-level management more standardized and standardized. With the development of science and technology, the transmission of village-level management information is more convenient and fast, and the behavior of village cadres is easier to be supervised and corrected. At the same time, the current village affairs management system also requires village cadres to publicize relevant accounts and details in a timely manner, and transparently display their work results and economic situation to villagers. These measures have made the villagers' supervision of the behavior of village cadres more effective, and effectively curbed the emergence of unreasonable income.
Finally, we should see that individual cases of unjustified income are not representative of the whole. Although a large number of problems have been carried out on the corruption of village cadres, it should be clear that this is only a small phenomenon and should never be used as a representative of the overall image of rural village cadres. The current village-level management system has really promoted the development and rectification of rural areas, allowing more village cadres to work conscientiously at their posts and make tangible contributions to the villagers.
To sum up, the problem of unreasonable income of village cadres has been effectively controlled under the current village-level management system, and all villagers should also raise their awareness and actively participate in the supervision and management of village-level affairs. At the same time, for individual illegal acts, we should discover and report them in a timely manner through legal channels to ensure that the problems are resolved in a timely manner. Only with the joint efforts and vigilance of all villagers can we push rural village-level management in a more standardized and transparent direction.