Recently, a bathing center called "Tangsheng Shuihui" in Huai'an, Jiangsu Province, caused an uproar. An angry reporter ** reported that the bathing center was suspected of providing improper *** and ** response measures caused social concern.
The reporter conducted a secret investigation on the night of November 28 and found that the bathing center claimed to provide bathing services on the surface, but in fact it secretly provided *** advertisements claiming that in order to celebrate the 7th anniversary of its opening, the original price of the ticket was 58 yuan and now it is only 16 yuan, which attracted the attention of reporters. Once inside, the staff introduced a variety of programs, including massages.
To the reporter's shock, the massage project of the bathing center was suspected of being illegal*** A masseuse told reporters that she only needed to pay 519 yuan to enjoy a full set of services, and also proposed to pay in two installments. This made the reporter aware of the illegal activities of the bathing center, so he called the police in a low-key manner to expose the matter.
However, ** showed unusual indifference in dealing with alarm events. Although the bathing centre was only two kilometres from the police station, it took 21 minutes for someone to be dispatched to solve the problem. When the two policemen arrived, the staff of the bathing center behaved calmly, even mocking the reporter that there was nothing going on in the police station. The police left in a hurry after only five minutes at the scene, questionable in their handling of the incident.
In the face of **'s questioning, **'s response is even more puzzling. For the survey results, ** indicates that other matters are being handled and it is not possible to respond immediately. When the reporter asked, the other party took a tough attitude, saying why he wanted to respond to the reporter. This unreasonable response was incomprehensible to journalists.
The journalist was appalled by the mishandling of the situation and decided to make public the video and call transcripts of the secret investigation. The incident sparked heated discussions among netizens, with voices defending the bathing center appearing in the comment section, questioning whether the reporter was bored and interfering in other people's affairs.
While netizens were discussing, Tan Yongsheng of the Jiangsu Provincial Public Security Department also expressed his views on the matter. He admitted that there were deficiencies in handling the police incident, and said that he would guide the public security and supervision team of the Provincial Public Security Department to take joint action to follow up and supervise the case. If it is found that there are problems such as cheating or abuse of power, it will be dealt with strictly in accordance with the law.
The incident raised questions about the legality of the law enforcement and bathing center, and the involvement of the provincial public security department in the investigation also provided key supervision for the further development of the incident. Concern about the incident is growing, and expectations for the results of the investigation are also increasing.