The doctor died, and he had no money and no right to enter the door. But it has nothing to do with the doctor. It is best for the doctor to have a clairing eye, and the iron mouth is broken. When medical care is marketized, and hospitals are not for the purpose of treating patients but for generating income, do you think patients will still trust doctors unconditionally?
Who makes the market-oriented?
However, it is difficult to see a doctor, and it is expensive to see a doctorDoctors also work part-time, but doctors are often the subject of conflict between doctors and patients.
Those who have the ability are not to raise their fists and contradict the medical staff, but to have the ability to go to the dean, the mayor, and the governor. If it doesn't work, you can overturn the existing medical system and come up with a completely new management mechanism yourself.
Doctors and nurses are hard-earned money. Doctors** do not determine the drugs**, and doctors** do not determine the cost of examinations. Don't say that the doctor won't see a doctor if he leaves the machine, the doctor is not a god who can directly cut to the point of medicine to get rid of the disease.
From birth to death, a person is greeted by medical care and rescued. It is like a protector of life. However, the malice and speculation of doctors in this society make it difficult for medical care to be carried out, and the restrictions of medical insurance are already the best efforts that can be made. And the public is bewitched by bad things, and the hatred of medical care is also unprecedented. In the long run, medical science will be hindered. The promotion and application of new technologies and drugs cannot be implemented, the loss of medical care, the loss and closure of hospitals, and ultimately the interests of the public will be harmed.