Maybe you've heard the legend of "two peaches kill three soldiers", but you don't know its deep meaning. This story involves Yan Zi in the Spring and Autumn Period, a famous thinker and politician. In the course of assisting the three generations of monarchs of Qi Linggong, Qi Zhuang Gong and Qi Jinggong, he attracted widespread attention because of an incident of "two peaches killing three soldiers".
Yan Zi's clever decision-making.
Yan Zi believed that the monarch should follow the righteousness of the monarch and the minister, and distinguish between the inferior and the inferior, so as not to become unruly, arrogant and rude, and endanger the country. He suggested that Qi Jinggong get rid of three arrogant warriors: Gongsun Jie, Tian Kaijiang, and Gu Yezi. Qi Jinggong said that it was difficult to **, so Yan Zi planned the strategy of "two peaches kill three soldiers".
Two peaches kill three soldiers".
Yan Zi asked Qi Jinggong to send someone to send two peaches to the three righteous men. They are supposed to take peaches according to their merits, and Yanzi's ingenuity lies in triggering infighting through this action. The three of them knew that not taking peaches meant that their merit and courage were inferior to others. Gongsun Jiehe and Tian Kaijiang respectively got two peaches by virtue of their military exploits.
However, Gu Yezi refused to admit defeat and stated his protection of the monarch, and finally demanded that the other two hand over the peach. Faced with this predicament, Gongsun Jiehetian Kaijiang thought that taking away the peaches was a sign of greed, so he would rather commit suicide and die. Gu Yezi thought that it was unkind and unjust for the two to commit suicide due to the fight for peaches, and finally chose to commit suicide.
Aftermath. This unbelievable story has caused future generations to think deeply. "Yanzi Spring and Autumn" is not an official history, so some people have doubts about the authenticity of this story. Some people think that perhaps it is a real historical event, but the three righteous men who committed suicide do exist. It is also believed that it is just an allegory, of a symbolic nature.
It is worth noting that even if the authenticity of this story is questionable, it still occupies an important place in history. Zhuge Liang liked to recite "Liang's Father's Yin" when he was ploughing in Longzhong to express his sympathy for these three warriors. After all, they are only tragedies caused by arrogance. Whether Yan Zi's design to get rid of these three warriors is right or wrong, maybe everyone has a different opinion.
Epilogue. 
The story of "Two Peach Killing Three Soldiers", true or false, is a thought-provoking fragment in the long river of history. It reflects Yan Zi's remarkable resourcefulness and makes people think about the balance between arrogance and etiquette. Whether it is the truth of history or the sustenance of fables, this story has left a deep imprint on the long river of history.
How Yan Zi skillfully defeated three righteous men with two peaches, the amazing inside story is revealed!This title is full of suspense and eye-catching, and people can't help but want to delve into the story of "Two Peach Kills Three Soldiers". In vivid language, the article describes in detail the decision-making process of Yan Zi and Qi Jinggong, as well as the development process of "two peaches killing three soldiers".
First, Yan Zi's thinking and decision-making process demonstrated his remarkable intellect as a statesman and thinker during the Spring and Autumn period. It is mentioned in the article that Yan Zi believes that the country needs warriors, but these warriors must understand the righteousness of the monarch and the minister, and the distinction between respect and inferiority. He skillfully persuaded Qi Jinggong to get rid of the arrogant and impudent three warriors, showing his deep understanding of political ethics and superb strategy.
Secondly, the article reveals Yan Zi's ingenious strategy in the process of "two peaches killing three soldiers". By sending two peaches, Yanzi caused the three righteous men to compete between merit and bravery, which eventually led to their cannibalism. This strategy not only reflects Yan Zi's superb scheming, but also demonstrates his deep insight into human nature.
In the process of the development of the story, each righteous man showed his own excellence, Gongsun Jie's fighting experience, Tian Kaijiang's military exploits, and Gu Yezi's heroic deeds of protecting the monarch. This makes the reader think more about the fate of these three righteous men. The scene of Gu Yezi's deeds of protecting the monarch to fight for peaches makes the whole story even more confusing.
In the "Aftermath" section, the article subtly expresses doubts about the authenticity of the story and points out different interpretations of the story in history. This part not only enriches the connotation of the story, but also inspires readers to think about historical stories and **.
In general, through the simple narration, the article successfully outlines the intricate relationship between Yanzi and the three righteous soldiers, as well as the profound connotation of the story of "two peaches killing three soldiers". The title party's approach also stimulates the reader's interest to a certain extent. As a response to the original text, this commentary** gives a positive evaluation of the intrigue and wisdom between Yan Zi and the righteous man depicted in the text, and raises some thoughts and questions about the whole story.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!