Against the backdrop of frequent frictions between China and the Philippines on the sea, India has stirred up waves at the junction of the Sino-Indian border. Recently, the Supreme Court of India issued a "ruling", saying that India's unilateral establishment of the "Ladakh Territory" is legal and valid, and supporting Modi's "downgrading" of Kashmir in an attempt to directly control the relevant areas, triggering a dispute over the western section of the Sino-Indian border.
In this regard, Chinese spokesperson Mao Ning resolutely stated that China has never recognized the "Ladakh ** Territory" illegally established by India, and pointed out that India's domestic judicial rulings cannot change the objective fact that the western section of the China-India border has always belonged to China. China adheres to its position of sovereignty over its own territory and rejects India's unilateral claims.
In fact, the motivation behind India's "killing two birds with one stone" ruling is not difficult to understand. On the eve of the upcoming India ** conference, Modi is desperately seeking re-election to consolidate his political position. Confronting China has become the easiest and most effective way to gain the support of domestic voters through a tough stance on China.
India shares many similarities with China, both of which are ancient civilizations, with a vast territory and a large population, but in terms of development, China is clearly ahead of India. As a result, India has developed a jealousy of China and a desire to surpass China's status. This mentality is dominant among all strata of India and has become the mainstream ideology of the Indian people.
Therefore, Modi incited Indian voters with the slogan of "grabbing China's land", successfully mobilized domestic enthusiasm and won the support of voters. In addition to showing toughness in the geopolitical sphere, Modi has also strengthened his stance on China by sending ** to visit the Philippines. Against the backdrop of the US and Japan's hype over the South China Sea issue, the move aims to cement Modi's political position by taking a tough line on China.
It is worth noting that India's choice to visit the Philippines is not accidental. There are frictions between China and the Philippines at sea, and India's dispatch of ** to Manila has made the effect even more significant, highlighting Modi's tough stance. At the same time, it has also attracted the attention of the Philippines and provided an opportunity for Modi to win more support internationally.
Modi's actions have drawn resentment from Pakistan, who accuse India of "mocking justice". This shows that a series of actions by India in the international arena could trigger regional tensions and have a potential impact on India's domestic political stability.
On further reflection, there may be other factors behind the Supreme Court of India's "ruling". Former Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines has favored shelving disputes with China, but Marcos is taking a tougher stance in the Philippines. In order to gain more support on the international stage, Marcos tried to form a "new eight-nation coalition" to win over allies such as the United States and Japan to deal with the dispute with China.
However, reinforcements are not an easy task. Marcos could fall into dependence on the United States and risk losing his country's sovereignty. It also exposes the relative vulnerability of the Philippines in the geopolitical game, unable to compete with major powers such as China.
In this regard, what do you think in front of the screen, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!
*All from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.