A country's internal affairs and reunification should be its own affairs, and external forces should not interfere. However, since modern times, Western countries have sought land, interests, and even resources and wealth by undermining the unity of other countries. This has become the core strategy of Western countries. Historically, the unification of many countries has been thwarted by the intervention of the West, which has also believed that it can prevent the unification of any country. However, there is one exception on this issue, a Western military expert frankly admitted: "The West has no chance of winning to prevent China's reunification."
China's reunification is unstoppable, and the West is in a difficult situation.
The West, in accordance with its own experience, has been undermining the unity of many powerful countries and gaining benefits through such means. For example, a wealth of experience was accumulated in the process of undermining the unification of the Ottoman Empire, Germany, France, the USSR and other countries. Western countries have always believed that China's unity is vulnerable to sabotage, and that it is only necessary to support the treasure island to achieve maximum damage and containment on the basis of it. However, in fact, in modern times, the West has tried to undermine the unity of China, only to find it more and more difficult.
Especially since the 50s of the last century, the United States has gradually developed a fear of China. Therefore, the West has become more cautious in undermining the unity of China. With the continuous improvement of Sino-Western relations, the West has used this method as a means to press the bottom of the box. However, with the rise of China, other means were ineffective, and the West once again came up with this one.
Military experts reveal China's invulnerability.
Western military experts have conducted countless deductions to prevent China's reunification, and finally came to a conclusion: The West has no chance of winning if it prevents China's reunification militarily. Why is this so?Although Treasure Island has a strait, its former width was an issue. The West can set up three island chains to block and defend, but in reality, China's military strength, coastal defense system, coastal defense system, and the entire missile system have formed a powerful whole. In particular, the Dongfeng series of missiles constitutes a three-in-one strike capability.
Therefore, within a radius of 1500 km, the military forces of the West are simply inaccessible, and even if they do, it is a dead end. More directly, China has largely militarily controlled the South China Sea. The islands and reefs in the South China Sea have become immovable aircraft carriers and are of great military significance. Together, these factors form an impenetrable line of defense, and even if the West invests all its Eastern military forces, it will not be possible to defeat China. This will only prove the ultimate defeat of the United States, as well as the end of American global hegemony.
China's military power is gradually emerging.
Due to the rapid development of China's military power, the West faces unprecedented challenges in preventing China's reunification. China's military power has grown to the point where it has had a significant impact on a global scale. China's missile systems, strategic islands and reefs, and integrated military deployments of land, sea and air have built an indestructible game.
In particular, the rise of the Dongfeng series of missiles has enabled China to reach the world's leading level in military technology. This three-in-one strike capability not only makes the West feel insurmountable, but also wins China a greater initiative in the military balance. The islands and reefs in the South China Sea not only provide China with a strategic base, but also serve as a solid foundation for a solid national defense.
Western countries face the final defeat.
Now, in the face of China's rise, Western countries have found that other means are no longer effective, so they have come up with means to prevent China's reunification. However, Western military experts have made countless deductions, and the final conclusion is only one: "The West has no chance of winning to prevent China's reunification."
Why is this so?Because once the West adopts this method, it means that they will play the last card, but they will not be able to end it, and will eventually fall into complete defeat. This will not only prove the final defeat of the United States, but also mark the end of American global hegemony. Western countries will face a series of drastic changes, and their countries will fall into chaos, and they may eventually fall into a catastrophe, which is a very terrible situation.
Epilogue. Western military experts bluntly said: "The West has no chance of winning in preventing China's reunification." China's rise has demonstrated unparalleled military power, making it increasingly difficult to prevent China's reunification. This also means that Western countries may take the last gamble on the national fortunes of the last few hundred years in modern times, and the end result may be a complete reversal of the global pattern. What do you think about this point of view?Welcome to leave a message, together**.
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the military power behind China's rise and the enormous dilemma faced by Western countries in preventing China's reunification. As can be seen from the article, China's rapid development in military technology and power has made it more difficult for Western countries to try to prevent China's reunification. Here are some personal comments on this view.
First, the article highlights the remarkable rise of China's military power, especially the dominance of the Dongfeng family of missiles. This is indeed a reflection of China's military-technological ambitions and remarkable progress. However, I think it also reminds us that in the modern arms race, any country should be guided by peaceful development and avoid excessive armament leading to the escalation of regional tensions.
Second, the article mentions the destruction of the unification of other countries by Western countries in modern times, as well as their obstruction of the unification of China. This viewpoint reflects historical facts to a certain extent, but it should also be noted that different countries and different periods have different historical backgrounds and patterns of international relations, and the same model cannot be simply applied. In today's world, respecting the sovereignty and development choices of all countries and advocating peaceful coexistence are important principles in international relations.
In addition, the article emphasizes China's control over the South China Sea and the military value of the islands and reefs. This is indeed one of China's geopolitical strengths, but I think it is also important to realize that regional peace and stability are essential for the common interests of all countries. Resolving disputes through dialogue and consultation and building more inclusive and mutually beneficial cooperative relations will help maintain regional peace and stability.
Finally, the article points out the final defeat that Western countries may face in preventing the reunification of China. This view reminds us that the international community needs to abandon the zero-sum game mentality and move towards win-win cooperation. All countries should work together to build an open, inclusive and mutually beneficial international order, and promote the development of a more just and democratic global governance system.
Overall, this article provides readers with a thought-provoking perspective on military dynamics in international relations, but at the same time, it is important to note that peace and cooperation remain the most important guiding principles in a complex and volatile international situation. In this era of globalization, all countries should work together to build a harmonious, stable and prosperous international community.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!