Recently, the city of GuangzhouElectric carsThe implementation of strict traffic restrictions has sparked widespread controversy. December 15th,Electric carsOn the first day of the traffic restriction, many road sections in Guangzhou appearedTransportationCongestion. For dependenceElectric carsFor low-income people who travel, this undoubtedly increases their travel pressure. Many questioned the reasonableness of such a policy and raised a series of objections. They thinkCity roadsUnreasonable design, uneven distribution of resources, and deformed housing prices areTransportationThe source of congestion, the limitElectric carsThe road doesn't solve the problem. They believe that ** should be in the normTransportationPunishment of violations on the basis of conduct, rather than blanket bansElectric cars
ForElectric carsThere are some different points of view. On the one hand, proponents of this policy argue thatElectric carsToo much involvement in Guangzhou will cause the problem of road congestion and cause trouble for citizens to travel. They believe that the restrictions can be effectively alleviatedTransportationpressure to improve the efficiency of road traffic. On the other hand, opponents of this policy argueElectric carsIt is a good choice to solve the problem of travel in the last few kilometers and can be alleviatedUrban transportPressure. They advocate that ** should be pushedTransportationGrooming and regulationTransportationacts, not through prohibitionsElectric carsto solve the problem.
It is understood that the city of GuangzhouElectric carsThe traffic restriction policy is not a total ban, but a partial ban on traffic in different time periods and regions. This policy is for certain regionsElectric carsA ban was issued, but it also retained its human side. Electric carsIn some respects convenience can not be ignored for relying onElectric carsTravel for people, restrictionsElectric carsThe road will bring a certain amount of inconvenience. ForTransportationWhen it comes to travel, the responsibility of ** should be to repair roads and guide themTransportation, and not overly restrictiveElectric carsuse.
At the same time as the controversy over Guangzhou's traffic restriction policy, Zibo City proposed the practice of implementing the three nos' principle, no prohibiting driving, no detaining cars, and no fines, all in the interests of the people. This approach has been appreciated by some people, who believe that it pays more attention to humanized services and respects the rights and interests of citizens. In contrast, Guangzhou's traffic restriction policy is in theory andLawsIt's hard to be convinced.
Some have questioned Guangzhou's policy on restricting traffic. They believe that the limitElectric carsThe road doesn't solve itTransportationCongestion problems. In contrast,CarsTakes up more space on the road, leading to more severeTransportationcongestion, why not limitCarsWhat about it?From the point of view of travel efficiency,Electric carsIt is ideal to solve the last few kilometersTransportationtools, should enjoy the same rights and interests on the road. The implementation of the traffic restriction policy has brought a lot of pressure to low-income people, and the situation has been worse.
By passingElectric carsThe understanding of the controversy over the traffic restriction policy, I think ** is being formulatedTransportationWhen making a policy, it is necessary to take into account a variety of factors. RestrictionsElectric carsThe upper road can be alleviated to a certain extentTransportationcongestion, but it will also cause problems for some low-income people to travel. **Should be in the normTransportationBehavior and improvementUrban transportfacilities to make more efforts to make all kindsTransportationtools are able to coexist better. At the same time, further research and improvement are neededUrban transportPlan to reduceTransportationThe occurrence of congestion problems. Only by putting people first and truly paying attention to the travel needs of citizens can we find more reasonable and effective solutions.
Electric carsThe traffic restriction policy has sparked widespread controversy and questioning. Different people have different views on the rationality, feasibility and impact of this policy. **In developmentTransportationMany factors need to be considered more comprehensively in the policy to alleviate itTransportationcongestion, but also to ensure the travel needs of citizens. In the normTransportationOn the basis of behavior, more attention should be paid to grooming and improvementTransportationfacilities, providing more choices and convenience for the public. Only by proceeding from the perspective of the people and truly being pragmatic for the people can we solve the problemTransportationproblems, reducing the annoyance of the citizens.