How do you think about the leader promoting a person, it is never about hard work?
Bihan Fengwen.
In other words, Liangshan 108 will rank the seats, and it can't completely look at the effort, and it needs to follow multi-dimensional factors. And he had to borrow the prestige of Gongsun Sheng, pretend to be heavenly, unify his understanding, and calm the noise.
So, what is the standard for Yangsan's seat ranking?
The size of the credit and the amount of contribution are the first evaluation criteria. After all, Liangshan was spelled out from childhood to adulthood.
Whether it is conducive to the implementation of the Yangshan Zhao'an route is the second element.
Yangsan is not a welfare home, and it has to survive by force. The strength of force is the third factor.
The fourth factor is to do a good job of balancing the various mountains and ensuring the stability of the overall situation. The big factions include the Liangshan veteran faction, the Song Jiang henchman faction, the Erlongshan faction, the Jieyang town faction, the Dengzhou faction, etc.
The proximity of the upper class is also a factor to measure. It's not hard to see why. Get close to the leader, relatively speaking, the leader knows more and can see it at a critical time, so there will naturally be more opportunities.
Therefore, even if it is the ranking of Liangshan, it is still mainly considered based on merit and contribution, referring to many factors such as route policy, strength of force, balance of mountains, and high-level proximity.
Back to the topic, if a leader promotes a person, it is never about hard work. Then only a few things can be said:First, some leaders are not doing practical things and are keen on speculation. A leader who does practical things, of course, needs a team that works hard, is conscientious and diligent, and of course needs people who work hard to start a business, otherwise it is difficult to do things and do good things. If it is just going through the motions, showmanship, engaging in formalism, and speculation, of course, from top to bottom, there is no need to do too much effort. Even those who work hard to do practical things will be forced to lie flat and have nothing to do.
Second, some units themselves do not have a sense of crisis, and it does not matter whether they do a good job or a bad job. In other words, can the work objectives and tasks of some units be completed?Or can't something go wrong?And what is the work performance and performance?It may not necessarily be related to the promotion of some leaders. Some jobs are done well, not necessarily promoted;Those who do not do well do not necessarily do not necessarily not be promoted. If this is true for the unit leader, of course it may be true for the subordinates.
There is also a kind of unit, which itself cannot measure the quality of the work, and it may not matter if someone else does it, whether it does it or not. Including the issuance of performance rewards, some units have never had anything to do with doing more or less.
Third, some lack leadership ability and lack the wisdom and pattern of selecting and employing people. This ability includes several aspects: for example, whether there is a vision to recognize people, whether there is a temperament to use people, whether there is a standard for evaluating people, and how to coordinate and balance the relationship between various interests. After all, personnel issues are the most complex, sensitive, and difficult to balance, and it is impossible to take care of only one factor, and all aspects need to be considered comprehensively. If the issue of "effort" is not considered at all, then this ability is a big question mark.
Of course, there is also the fact that individual leaders are **, so it is even more difficult to imagine how much effort will be seen, and it has long been dominated by all kinds of "power and wealth".
In fact, there are unfairness and injustice in a place or unit, and there will be leaders who never consider people who work hard, and there are indeed unspoken rules for promotion and promotion. But this phenomenon will not be absolute, people who work hard still have opportunities and platforms, and it is impossible for all leaders to be so unbearable. Otherwise, how will mankind develop, how will society advance, and how will civilization progress.
However, since some people have raised this question, we have to think and pay attention to it, that is, how to make people who work hard not suffer?That is, to let honest people not suffer, it is time to attach great importance to it. For example, what methods and standards are used to determine the scope of "effort"?For example, how to make "hard work and no effort" stand up to the evaluation and supervision of society?They all need to be improved and strengthened at the level of institutional mechanisms.