How did India's bad reputation as the "country of the best" come about?Why do these phenomena continue to be banned?
The complex structure of the Indian social system is deeply rooted in the caste system, which divides society into four main classes, each with specific responsibilities and social status.
Brahmins, like lamps in the starry sky, are the wise men and teachers of this society. They are not only religious leaders, but also bearers of knowledge. Through their advanced education system, they have trained generations of scholars and clergy, injecting the soul of wisdom into society as a whole.
Kshatriyas, on the other hand, are the guardians and defenders of this society. They are tasked with guarding the peace, and they are fighting to the death to protect the teachings of the wise men. In them, a kind of loyalty and courage is embodied, and they are a solid supporting force for this society.
Vaishyas are the founders of commercial prosperity. They make a living from business and **, creating the wealth of society. Although they were relatively weak politically, their economic contributions allowed the entire society to prosper, creating a blend of economy and culture.
Shudras are craftsmen and servants of this society. Through their skillful craftsmanship, they provide basic material support to the whole society. Despite their lower social status, their efforts and creativity form part of the diversity of society.
Outside of this system, there are groups known as "untouchables". They do not belong to any caste and live on the margins of society.
This unique system divides people into different groups and intanguls their life trajectories closely with the complexity of these labels.
When people of different castes meet at the intersection of life, the seeds of love take root in this complex soil. However, the cruel web of fate is tightly pulled at this time, and the love between different castes becomes like a prison barrier. Their offspring, labelled as a "mongrel" by society, are destined to live in the shadows, suffering from unwarranted exclusion and discrimination.
What is even more heartbreaking is that when we talk about "untouchables" in society, the term actually isolates an entire group of people from society altogether. These individuals are not only marginalized in society, but are seen as untouchable beings, living in lonely and forgotten corners. Their existence is marginalized, their personalities and labor force are undervalued and disregarded, and it seems doomed that they will never be able to cross the social divide.
The brutality of this system has caused widespread concern and criticism. Over time, some courageous social movements began to work to challenge this injustice, calling for the abolition of these restrictions and discrimination. However, it is still a long and difficult journey to break free from these heavy shackles and achieve true equality.
In the land of India, the social system is like a heavy mountain, and everyone is forced to carry a heavy burden. Whether they are "mongrels" or "untouchables", they are condemned at birth to a fate that cannot be easily changed. This harsh reality constitutes an insurmountable obstacle that makes injustice a curse of fate. This corner of society seems to be deeply engraved with their loneliness and abandonment.
Marriage, in this society, is no longer just the meeting of two hearts, but a transaction that is deeply rooted in the social hierarchy. This ancient system saw marriage as an opportunity, a way to advance in society.
In this system, high-caste males became the coveted object of many families, as combining with them would raise the status of the entire family. This desire gave rise to expensive bride price deals, and marrying a girl became a business transaction rather than a simple emotional connection.
This phenomenon is deeply rooted in tradition, but it has also caused a lot of controversy and reflection. Many people have begun to question this notion of marriage based on social status, arguing that it deprives individuals of their autonomy and equality.
In families that cannot afford the heavy bride price, consanguineous marriages are emerging as a new option. Such a choice is not a real love story, but more like a response to a self-protection mechanism. Although marriages between relatives have eased the burden economically, they have also provoked more profound social problems.
In some families, the belief that "early marriage is better" is deeply ingrained. Girls are arranged to marry at a young age, and their future seems predestined. Particularly in the south, child and consanguineous marriages are more prevalent, depriving some children of their right to a carefree childhood.
Although some laws have been put in place to prohibit child and consanguineous marriages, these phenomena persist. These regulations have not completely prevented this phenomenon from happening, but have triggered more discussion and reflection at the social level. There is a beginning to recognize that consanguineous marriages are merely a means of coping with high bride prices, but they expose the deep problems of socio-economic inequality.
Child marriage looms like a shadow over innocent children's lives, depriving them of their right to choose their own future. This is not just a violation of children's rights, but a silent war that has pushed them into the abyss of the unknown. And the solution to these problems is far more than superficial changes in laws and regulations.
In this land, women have always borne a heavy social status and are bound to the cage of tradition. Many women endure violence from their husbands in silence, and their voices seem to be silenced by the shackles of society. Even women of the Brahmin caste, even with noble blood, are subject to great restrictions in marriage, and are even forbidden to divorce unless they are childless. It's like an invisible captivity, trapping them in the confinement of traditional ideas.
As for widows, they are denied the right to remarry. It's a war of minds, a fate bound by stereotypes. Their hearts may still be grieving for their deceased husbands, but they are forced to live a single life under the gaze of society, losing the opportunity to start over. This is a profound injury to the rights and dignity of the individual, and it is also a cruel restriction on women in society.
In the land of India, the strict restrictions of the caste system permeate every corner of the institution of marriage like an invisible web. Historically, when a husband died, the wife's choice was once limited to following traditional rituals and even the horrific practice of martyrdom. Although these traditions have changed over time, in some regions they still persist as if they were an unforgettable mark of time.
These appalling customs and traditions have become a shadow over Indian society, making the perception of the country harsh and grim. Being labeled as "the country of **" and "forbidden land for women" seems to deeply reflect the cruel reality that feudal concepts still exist in contemporary society. Under the shadow of these ideas, the fate and happiness of many people are ruthlessly distorted and suppressed.
In this contradictory society, how can we pursue true equality and dignity?
*From the Internet, if there is any infringement, contact to delete!