With the implementation of materialization, the mode of discipline selection has changed significantly. Prior to this, chemistry was the most difficult subject, and students in the lower middle class generally abandoned chemistry, and middle students were reluctant to choose chemistry. However, after the physicochemical **, students who do not choose chemistry will be affected by the limited choice of subjects, and the combination of physicochemical and physicochemical biology will change from popular to unpopular, resulting in a significant increase in the number of chemistry subjects and a significant decrease in the number of biology choices. This means that there is no longer a combination of top students among the students who choose chemistry, and the difficulty of assigning points to chemistry itself is relatively reduced.
Before physicochemistry, chemistry was generally considered to be the most difficult subject. However, when chemistry and biology are compared, we can see that there is a certain difference in the difficulty of assigning points. Because geography gathers liberal arts, sports and art students, the overall level is low, so the difficulty of assigning points to geography is relatively low. Due to the metaphysical characteristics of biology, the difficulty of assigning points may be slightly higher due to some accidental factors, but on the whole, the difference between the difficulty of assigning points between geography and biology is not obvious. Therefore, some top students may choose biology as a subject to assign points in order to pursue higher scores.
Although there are some differences in the difficulty of assigning points between chemistry and biology, after the physicochemistry**, the choice of major has become the primary consideration for students. Many lower-middle-class students choose Physics and Chemistry** to broaden their choice of majors, and give up choosing chemistry or biology alone. For these students, even if they choose chemistry, they may still become the new end due to the lack of other slag at the bottom, and they will not be able to get a significant score improvement effect. As a result, they are more inclined to choose other subjects in anticipation of a higher score on assignment.
The implementation of materialization has led to an obvious domino effect in the choice of disciplines. After the scumbags abstained from chemistry, the middle and lower class students generally chose other subjects, which led to a significant increase in the number of choices in chemistry and a significant decrease in the number of choices in biology. At the same time, Xueba students also generally choose physicochemistry**, so that students who choose chemistry alone no longer have the conditions for the combination of Xueba. To sum up, materialization has a great impact on the choice of disciplines.
Through the comparative analysis of biology and chemistry after physicochemical **, I believe that personal professional interest and future development direction are crucial considerations when choosing a sub-discipline. Although chemistry was considered the most difficult discipline to assign in the past, the position of chemistry in the choice of disciplines has changed after the physicochemical **. Therefore, students should have a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of each subject and the difficulty of assigning marks, and make an informed choice based on their own strengths and interests. In addition, the choice of major is also a factor that cannot be ignored, and students should consider the future employment prospects and personal development direction of the major, and choose the corresponding assigned discipline. All in all, students should comprehensively consider their personal interests, the difficulty of assigning points, and the requirements of their majors when choosing a subject, and make correct decisions through scientific data analysis and in-depth thinking.