In the past two days, many people have left messages to me: Ding Taisheng is criticizing you again. One look, sure enough. He said I was short-sighted and put the cart before the horse.
Since Ding Taisheng was "surrendered", I have not mentioned this person again, upholding the principle of "water dogs" not fighting. But when she came ashore, she shook the water and began to bark again, tossing and turning over and over the clichés, like a complaining woman's chatter. still doesn't talk about the essence of **, only talks about the artist's lace and the so-called empty aesthetics.
Ding Taisheng said that I am short-sighted, only focusing on skills and not aesthetics, and said: **The first is art, and the second is the expression of skills. Think I'm putting the cart before the horse, putting my skills above my art.
As we all know, people's aesthetics vary from person to person, aesthetics are different but there is no right or wrong, if a music critic only comments on aesthetic consciousness, without the support of **ontology, shouting out the sky, it is only a personal hobby expression, and the aesthetic theory of extracting **ontology** is undoubtedly empty.
In view of the fact that the **aesthetics major established by the **college is not art first and empty aesthetics as Ding Taisheng said, but a sub-discipline of **science based on various **theories and ontologies, which has extremely high requirements for **theoretical literacy. Because, once the **aesthetic is separated from**ontology, it becomes a castle in the air, and it cannot stand at all.
Why is Ding Taisheng so "emphasizing aesthetics and ignoring theory"?Because aesthetics is abstract, there is no right or wrong, you can imagine wildly, and you don't even need the support of the ontology to talk about it. However, when it comes to the best theory, it is much more complicated, and it takes a long time of systematic study and practice to master. Ding Taisheng's shortcomings lie in the fact that he has not systematically learned, and seriously underestimates the specific difficulty of theory and technology in practice. Therefore, we can only use aesthetic bluff and vulgar language to attract people's attention, and avoid shortcomings without talking about the essence of **.
Theoretically speaking, it is true that art is true, but the premise of artistic expression is to have good professional skills and literacy. Any artist with a high aesthetic or a high-level audience is built on a deep professional ontology.
In today's Chinese music scene, singers and listeners generally lack the best literacy and basic skills. The lack of a theoretical basis is the fundamental reason for the low aesthetics. Therefore, I emphasize that we should first emphasize theory and technique, and then talk about aesthetics. If even the most basic ** literacy has not been accumulated, how can the aesthetic subject establish a high aesthetic?How do you get to the Sky Pavilion without stairs?
Therefore, slogan-style empty talk about aesthetics like Ding Taisheng essentially has no meaning for improving aesthetics, but only allows some people who are unwilling to spend energy to accumulate ** literacy to obtain a kind of conscious group identity.
Ding Taisheng criticized me: I climaxed when I heard the high notes. Actually, I don't like high-pitched show-offs, my favorite genres are folk and rock, I like to sing in a shallow voice, and I like to be sincere and direct. But as a commentator, you can't judge based on your personal hobbies alone, therefore, I don't like to show off skills but agree with the expression of superb skills, and I also know that the difficulty of "showing off skills" requires the accumulation of profound theories and literacy. And Ding Taisheng's criticism of a certain singer's show-off skills is to impose his subjective preferences on others, thinking that "flowers should not be added here, and there should be no corners", and he really regarded himself as a "traffic policeman".
Ding Taisheng is not ashamed: Music theory can interpret ** skills but cannot analyze ** as art. This is another typical fallacy that puts aside the empty talk of aesthetics on the ontology!Stripping away the theory is itself an absurd cognition.
Music theory can't analyze the quality of ** as art?What can?Is it math?Ding Taisheng's understanding of music theory is biased and narrow, thinking that music theory is the "Basic Theory". In fact, music theory encompasses a wide range of topics, namely: a general term for the theoretical system.
What is art?What is the quality of art?If this problem is put aside from the ontology, the so-called aesthetic and artistic judgments will be empty, and it will become a subjective judgment of personal preference. And Ding Taisheng's problem is precisely that he always regards his personal preferences as the best aesthetic standard, ignoring the difference in aesthetics. This not only reflects his lack of literacy, but also exposes his lack of cognition.
Ding Taisheng also said that I: I like to hold stinky feet, and I like to praise the good of singers. I wondered, why do some fans of Daolang think that I am in Black Daolang just like eating a scale?Because of my criticism of Daolang from certain angles, I have been confronted by me. When I was commenting on Jay Chou's "Red Face Like Frost" as a big failure, I said that I was the one with stinky feet, where did I go?When I pointed out the problem of singers such as Hua Chenyu and Wang Feng going out of tune on the spot, where did you go?When I analyzed and criticized the fake singing turmoil of *** and published several episodes of the program, where did you go?There are also many episodes where you go when I point out all sorts of issues to other singers
Selectively invisible?That's okay.
When I make comments, I have the attitude that the point of view should be clear, but the language is not necessarily sharp. I identify with the good works I love, but I also identify with the good works I don't like. Criticize "bad money", but don't spit.
The point of view is sharp, and it does not necessarily have to be vicious. If the attitude of the critic is not acceptable to the critic, no matter how good the suggestion is, it is meaningless. Because, the interactivity of communicating with each other no longer exists. And once criticism loses its meaning, it is tantamount to a shrew scolding the street.
On ** reviews, I stand by my opinion. In the current stage of the Chinese music scene, emphasizing technology and theory is far more important than aesthetics and has more practical significance. In the future, I will pay more attention to the three major cancers in today's music scene: lip-syncing, plagiarism and out-of-tune. My attitude is: zero tolerance for lip-syncing;Plagiarism is not tolerated;Low tolerance for out-of-tune. In the future, whenever such issues are involved, I will seriously point them out and sharply criticize them.
In today's music scene, we need to emphasize technology and theory, because when theory and technology are improved, aesthetics will naturally rise. This is the fundamental difference between my views and Ding Taisheng. I don't know who is short-sighted and puts the cart before the horse?
Finally, let me explain, why did I respond to Ding Taisheng with words?Because the contemptible people are angry and angry, they are afraid that the language expression is not good, which makes netizens unhappy. Therefore, the text replied.
At this point, I know very well that it is not Ding Taisheng's opponent. He can scold you in his heart, but he still has a smile on his face. The technology is despicable and can't do it. Joy and anger are distinct, the form is in color, and this situation is contemptible and losing. (Wen You Jingbo).