The dangerous alliance of the German army under the Nazis with Hitler

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-19

The fateful choice of the top generals of the Wehrmacht.

The senior generals of the Wehrmacht did not voluntarily pledge allegiance to Hitler, but had no choice but to do so under the coercive orders of the Ministry of Defense. General Blomberg's Order of Allegiance in 1934 linked the Wehrmacht to Hitler's Nazi regime and paved the way for Hitler's bold removal of the Wehrmacht leadership. However, Bloomberg's short-sightedness and misbelief in Hitler's rhetoric led him to a fatal mistake that led him to criticism from the military.

Hitler's expansion of power and the loss of control of the Wehrmacht.

The issuance of the Blomberg Allegiance Order allowed Hitler to legally intervene in the Wehrmacht's personnel appointments. Hitler dismissed Blomberg and Army Commander Fritsch and personally assumed the post of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, appointing his confidant Keitel as the supreme chief of the Ministry of Defense. This move allowed Hitler to rightfully assume control of the Wehrmacht. After the defeat on the Eastern Front in 1941, Hitler finally found an excuse to take action against Army Commander-in-Chief Brauchitsch and completely seize control of the Wehrmacht.

The betrayal of promises and the rise of the SS.

Blomberg's order to pledge allegiance to Hitler was largely based on Hitler's promise that the Wehrmacht would be Germany's only regular armed force. However, Hitler did not fulfill this promise and vigorously developed the SS, constantly expanding its size. Although the SS could not replace the Wehrmacht, Hitler's idea of the Wehrmacht was always alive. Bound by the oath, the Wehrmacht had to obey Hitler's orders, and no one dared to break the oath.

This history reveals the plight and choices of the Wehrmacht's top generals under Nazi rule, and the disastrous consequences of their miscalculation and trust in Hitler. The political changes of this period changed the Wehrmacht from a cooperative relationship to a subordinate one, which eventually led to Hitler's complete control of the army.

The article vividly depicts the intricate relationship between the Wehrmacht and Hitler under Nazi rule. Through an in-depth analysis of historical details, the author presents the dilemmas and choices faced by the senior generals of that period, and the far-reaching impact of these choices on the entire country and the army.

First, the article highlights the profound impact of General Blomberg's allegiance order in 1934 on the Wehrmacht. This order linked the Wehrmacht to Hitler's rule, thus transforming the relationship into a subordinate relationship. This decision became the legal basis for Hitler's subsequent removal of the leadership of the Wehrmacht, and promoted Hitler's gradual control of the army.

Second, the article points out that General Blomberg's short-sightedness and misbelief in Hitler's words led him to a fatal mistake in the long course of history. This blind trust in the leaders ultimately led to confusion within the Wehrmacht and dissatisfaction with its leadership. Through this description, the author reflects the fragility of the military leadership in the political struggle at that time, as well as the sensitivity to the political atmosphere under Nazi rule.

In the second half of the article, the author elaborates on Hitler's expansion of power over the Wehrmacht, as well as his vigorous development of the SS. This section reveals Hitler's quest for his own authority, but also his distrust of the Wehrmacht. Hitler finally seized control of the Wehrmacht by removing senior generals, directly serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and appointing cronies as supreme commanders of the Ministry of Defense.

Finally, the article highlights Hitler's betrayal of the promise that the Wehrmacht would be the only regular armed force. This underscores Hitler's manoeuvres and dishonesty with his oath. Through the lens of history, the article reveals that the thirst for power of political leaders often leads to irreparable political and social chaos.

Overall, the essay vividly paints a vivid picture of the political landscape of that period through an in-depth analysis of the Wehrmacht's relationship with Hitler. The fatalistic choices of the top generals, the crisis of confidence in the leadership, and Hitler's thirst for power and disregard for his oath make for a thought-provoking historical picture. This history reminds us of how the relationship between politics and the military evolves and has a profound impact on the fate of a country.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages