Hello everyone!I am a tourist, and I travel to see the world.
The Navy recently retired 22 056 frigates at one time, and some netizens commented that the Navy is really arrogant, with a wave of his hand, 22 will be gone, which is almost equivalent to the sum of the strongest French destroyers in Europe, and this action is the navy of a European power. Speaking of which, some people are about to ask, don't we need coastal anti-submarine patrols and defenses?Of course, it is necessary to respond to this question by a recent ** from the shipyard. However, we have a new replacement ship that is about to enter service, which is really gratifying!But don't underestimate that this is just a frigate, in addition to ensuring daily air defense and anti-submarine patrol tasks, it also indicates a change in the strategic thinking of the navy.
Previously, the displacement of 056 was 1500 tons, and now the new frigate is estimated to be between 2000-2500 tons, which is larger, which has an obvious advantage that it is more powerful and self-sustaining for a longer time. This self-sustaining capability has a great advantage, that is, in order to adapt to the combat mission in the new era, it is necessary to ensure that it can perform the alert task for a long time, as a grid member standing, this is just like the block responsibility package system of the public security joint defense officer, she is responsible for the safety of her own responsibility area, she is in charge of this piece, this is a node of the Navy's distributed maritime operations (Distributed Maritime Operations, abbreviated DMO). In this way, many ships of the navy will not be crowded together, and modern missile technology will not be wiped out. The DMO idea allows each place to have offensive and defensive nodes, and the members are efficiently linked together, and if there is a battle loss, other reserve forces can immediately come over to replace it, ensuring that all places will not be breached.
But in this way of thinking, if others concentrate a large fleet to break in, will they have to break through individually? If this happens, another layer of secondary members is required. That is the reserve support fleet or arsenal ship, in addition to the arsenal ship has a strong attack capability, an important role is that it can provide enough firepower, even to deal with a fleet can be more than enough. There is a front-line detection and defense capability in the front, and a strong support reserve force in the rear. In this way, there is no need to arrange a fleet in every place, and if there is no fleet, there will be a system vulnerability, and the flaws will be given to others. In this way of thinking, is it possible to play a strong combat role in the case of insufficient ships?
If we don't think like this, wouldn't we have to build more fleets and larger ships to have enough strength to complete the offensive and defensive tasks? This is one of the reasons for the change of the navy, not only the displacement is a little larger, the armament is a little more, but also the position can be more durable, to ensure that the combat system is strong, this larger point is very outstanding!
At the same time, there is no need for too many large ships, which are powerful and domineering, with sufficient self-sustaining ability, but the cost is high, and the losses in battle damage are too huge. Modern warfare missile technology is too developed, hypersonic ** is powerful, no matter how powerful ** is for missiles, it is difficult to escape death, so not all are big ships, the bigger the better, it is very important to adapt to the current war!
Do you think that under the new strategic thinking, it would be better to build the navy in this way?Let us know.