At the pollen annual meeting, Yu Chengdong said that some friends did not respect intellectual property rights and directly renamed Huawei's double-spin waterdrop hinge to keel.
Slowly, since it comes to "keel", this is equivalent to naming and saying that "friendly businessmen" are millet.
Xiaomi said that it was engaged in keel hinge technology.
As a result, Xiaomi issued a "statement on Mr. Yu Chengdong's false remarks", saying that Yu Chengdong's remarks were seriously inconsistent with the facts.
Actually, it's not that complicated.
Both Xiaomi and Huawei have their own patents on hinge technology. Xiaomi's keel hinge technology patent application date is September 18, 2020, while Huawei's patent application date for dual-spin waterdrop hinge is December 13, 2019, but the publication date of Xiaomi's patent is January 5, 2021, while Huawei's patent publication date is June 18, 2021.
Theoretically, Xiaomi can't copy Huawei unless Xiaomi has installed commercial spying.
I myself also think that Mr. Yu's words are a little inappropriate, because if you are sure that Xiaomi has not respected its intellectual property rights, then you should hand this matter over to the legal department to deal with, get the court's judgment and then make it public, what else can Xiaomi say?
That's called a real hammer. Intellectual property is not child's play, and it cannot be said to come out of nowhere. Even if the people in the rivers and lakes give the nickname "Yu Dazui", they can't.
Just because you have a big mouth doesn't mean you're always right.
Of course, I still see a lot of pollen unconvinced, joking that "China's Huawei, the world's Xiaomi", the implication is that Huawei is too powerful, so powerful that the international market trembles, so Huawei has to sanction Huawei, so Huawei is grounded in the country, is a tragic hero. And Xiaomi relies on the snort of foreign capital, has no core technology, and its success in going to sea is just a villain's ambition.
However, ridicule is ridicule, but I take this sentence seriously.
Whether it is strong or not, in the end, the market has the final say.
It is an indisputable fact that Huawei is indeed very strong in the domestic market. As for why it was sanctioned, I have not seen a convincing explanation to this day. "Huawei is sanctioned because it is strong" is certainly an exciting statement, but it still lacks sufficient explanatory power in front of me.
Because if he's strong enough, he's supposed to sanction someone else, isn't he?
There are shortcomings in being sanctioned by others, and it is still too early to talk about "strong".
As for Xiaomi, it is diligent and well-behaved to expand its overseas business, and the current development momentum is very good. I think there is still a lot of room for growth in Xiaomi's overseas business.
To a large extent, Xiaomi represents the status quo of Made in China: affordable, close to consumer demand, and deeply embedded in the international market – including the use of the latest foreign chips. It is unjustifiable that such a company does not have a place in the international market.
Some people ridicule Xiaomi for not having core technology, and they think that chips are the core technology. It's not interesting to argue about this topic, Xiaomi mobile phone is a mobile phone company, not a chip company, who stipulates that mobile phone companies can only produce mobile phones with their own chips?
Boeing is an aircraft manufacturing company, but Boeing also orders engines from other companies.
Huawei is tied up and turns to the domestic market, which is of course a good choice, but don't think of driving all competitors overseas and being the only one in the world. The market is open, and fair competition is the most basic principle. They attacked the car emperor for not being scientific and rigorous, and attacked Xiaomi for not respecting intellectual property rights, why can't it be solved directly through legal means?
Huawei's products are indeed very good, and the innovation ability is enough, but the marketing appearance is a bit ugly, and it always appears as a single person in the entire Western world. Scientific and technological innovation is the joint efforts of thousands of smart minds, and win-win cooperation is the only way out. Can a company jump into the sky?I don't believe it.
But I also know that some people believe it, and some people eat his set, and they like his horizontal energy.
Horizontal is also a marketable position.
Original work, thank you for reading