History is always flown with a veil that is difficult to distinguish between truth and falsehood. In people's minds, there have been heroic feats in the Sui and Tang dynasties, but among them, the four famous generals are a mystery in history. They seem to be imaginary legends, but they are deeply rooted in people's beliefs and heroic myths. How were the figures of these famous generals created, and what kind of historical secrets are hidden?
From ancient times to the present, heroes have been lost, and history has been shrouded in an illusory veil. In the Sui and Tang dynasties, although people preserved real heroes such as Yue Fei and Huo Qubing through the ages with pen and ink and legends, they also carved the statues of four famous generals with their own imagination. The first, Li Yuanba, who was portrayed as an infinitely powerful man, seemed to be one of the most courageous generals in the Sui and Tang dynasties, but historical records erased him. His existence is only a product of fiction, and in actual history, it may be more similar to Li Xuanba.
At the same time, the fiction of Yuwen Chengdu also leaves history with mystery. He is portrayed as a valiant warrior, but in the inscriptions of history, he is nowhere to be seen. Just like Li Yuanba's fiction, Yuwen Chengdu is only a hero in people's imagination, and has no intersection with actual history.
Luo Cheng, another famous general in the legend of the Sui and Tang dynasties, is young and handsome, with great achievements. However, there is no trace of it in the historical notes. People may take Luo Shixin as a counterpart, but the essence and experience of the two are very different.
Finally, Xue Dingshan, a fictitious descendant of the famous general Xue Rengui, although brave and good at fighting, has disappeared in the records of history. The legend he created is very different from the historical truth.
These four imaginary celebrities may be just a ripple in the long river of history, but they represent people's yearning for courage, faith and fighting spirit. Their fiction may not be to subvert history, but to pass on a spirit. In these legends, we may find another meaning of existence beyond the historical truth.
Historical Truth Revealed: Has the "Crime" of King Su Been Distorted?
History is a story written by a historian, but how can the truth hidden in it be easily visible?Throughout the ages, historical records are often distorted, such as the Tang Taizong ordered the historian to belittle the former crown prince Li Jiancheng, and the king of Shang was portrayed as a tyrant, and the authenticity of these hand-me-down works is worrying. It's like the crime of the King of Wu, which was woven by the King of Martial Arts".
There are many theories about the crimes against which the king is charged. Historians have fiercely debated the **, greed, and cruelty of the king. However, the true image of the King is full of fog.
The King of the Throne has been portrayed in history as a tyrant who exterminated humanity, but how can the truth be easily judged?According to historical sources, the king was not completely unforgivable. Did King Wu of Zhou deliberately exaggerate his sins when he wrote the story about King Zhou?
Historians have doubts about the framing of King Wu of Zhou. In the struggle for power, the king may be portrayed worse than he really is. Whether King Wu of Zhou's accusations are true or not, there are different opinions.
The historical truth of the king may be hidden in the pen of the victor. King Wu of Zhou painted a mirror and depicted the crimes of King Zhou, but he could not state it concretely. With the passage of time, the "crime" of the king has intensified, which inevitably makes people suspicious.
Historians have different evaluations of the Emperor. From Zigong of the Qin Dynasty, Mencius of Confucianism, to Guo Moruo in modern times, many people have different opinions about King Xu. The crimes in the history books may just be the "demonization" imagined by later generations.
Cultural differences also affect the evaluation of the king. The banquet of the king and the governance of the government by women were not a crime in the Shang Dynasty, but they were misunderstood as "crimes" by later generations. Has the turn of history created a misunderstanding of the king?
Contemporary historians are more avant-garde in their view. They questioned the increasing number of crimes committed by the Emperor in the history books, believing that it might be fabricated. In the face of such a plurality of views, the history of the Emperor gradually seems to be confusing.
Exposing historical lies is not an easy task. The true face of the king may be exaggerated, misunderstood by cultural differences, or imagined by future generations. The truth of history may never be revealed.
The above content may only be the tip of the iceberg of the historical figure of the king of the ring, revealing the interweaving of truth and falsehood behind the historical story, and the king of this "crime" may be just a meteor on the stage of history.
When commenting on history, we often fall into doubts and confusion in the interpretation of historical facts. Just like the one mentioned in the article, whether or not his crimes were exaggerated, the different views of historians make our perception of this historical figure complex and diverse.
First, history, as a story recorded by historians, is often subject to the tendencies of the victors, resulting in a version of history that is more favorable to their own. For example, Tang Taizong's belittling of the former crown prince Li Jiancheng and King Wu of Zhou's stigmatization of the king of Zhou are all historical embellishments carried out by the victors in order to consolidate their position and shape the image of their opponents.
Second, historians have a variety of opinions on the "crimes" of the Emperor. Some believe that he was a tyrant and cruel to the people, while others believe that he may not have been. This pluralistic perspective makes our evaluation of historical figures more diverse and in-depth. However, regardless of the point of view, we should examine the facts and logic of history, avoid one-sided understanding of historical figures, and instead examine their actions and influences from multiple perspectives.
In addition, cultural differences are also an important factor in our understanding of history. The Emperor is described in the history books as indulging in the wine pond meat forest and appointing women to participate in court politics, but these actions may not have been considered a crime at the time. Because in the context of the Shang Dynasty, these may have been behaviors that conformed to the social norms of the time. Therefore, the evaluation of historical figures needs to take into account the culture and values of the time and avoid imposing modern ideas on ancient figures.
Finally, the interpretation of history should not stay on the surface of history books, but should be combined with historical materials, archaeology and the views of different scholars to conduct comprehensive research and thinking. Only through multi-faceted exploration and dialectical thinking can we understand history more comprehensively and better grasp the essence and significance of historical figures.
In general, the truth of history is often more than a singular one.
1. What is static and unchanging, it is often diverse, complex and colorful. We should examine the evaluation and interpretation of historical figures with an objective and rational attitude, and avoid blindly accepting a single version of history, so as not to misunderstand and distort the image of historical figures.
The historical interpretation presented in the article is thought-provoking. History, as a record of human experience, is often influenced by the tendency of the recorder, the victor, or the era, resulting in the veracity of history often being questioned. The image of this historical figure.
The article points out how the victor portrayed his opponent, such as Tang Taizong's order to belittle the former Taizong.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!