Russia said that the CIA plans to establish a "Russian republic" and establish a separate ** to directly replace Putin
After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the West showed strong dissatisfaction with Russia**. The West has long resorted to an ingenious tactic of focusing criticism on the Putin regime while not directly opposing Russia. However, this practice has actually caused serious damage to the interests of the Russian people.
Today, Russia is facing the toughest sanctions imposed by the West, and the consequences are not limited to the impact on Russia**, but also affect the Russian people. Although Western politicians pretend to care about the Russian people and place the blame on Putin**, in fact a series of measures have been taken to create the illusion that Russia** is the culprit for harming national interests.
The purpose behind such actions boils down to trying to overthrow Putin, trying to put Russia through a transformation similar to that of Ukraine. Looking back at 2014, the West successfully influenced regime change in Ukraine, and now Ukraine has moved closer to the West wholeheartedly. The West hopes to bring about similar political changes in Russia through similar means, but its attempts to overthrow Putin have not yielded substantial results.
Separately, the head of Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergei Naryshkin, noted that the CIA is considering the creation of a virtual "legal state" outside the Russian Federation called the "Russian Republic", headed by a so-called "temporary **". This plan is reminiscent of what happened in Venezuela in the past, where there was also a repeat of a "temporary**" model recognized by the West that could become a tactic for the United States to try to push an opposition leader similar to Guaidó in Russia to counter the Putin regime.
Given the CIA's long history of bad records, one needs to be vigilant about what they might do. In any case, this possibility is worrying, since similar operations have already taken place in the past, and the possibility of the United States confronting the Putin regime by supporting the Russian version of "Guaidó" is not ruled out.
The United States has always demonstrated a unique approach to regime change at home. They are adept at using tactics such as "temporary" and "color revolutions", although the specific methods of operation vary. Looking back at the 2014 "Maidan Revolution" in Ukraine, the typical "color revolution" tactics were used to forcibly overthrow the then Ukrainian elections**.
This tactic is difficult to replicate in Russia, which has always been on high alert for "color revolutions", especially with the frequent occurrence of similar incidents in the CIS countries. Faced with this reality, other viable avenues need to be found.
The situation mentioned by Naryshkin depicts another possible means of supporting a puppet leader by creating a "temporary **" and declaring that the puppet is the "leader of Russia", and then gradually implementing the overthrow of the leader. This tactic is not impossible, even if applied to Russia, and similar practices have been successfully implemented even in Venezuela, even in the face of the hard-line Putin.
Russia ** is coming, and this is an important historical moment. However, we should not take this lightly, because past experience has shown that the United States tends to launch so-called "color revolutions" in the first year of the year, trying to use this critical moment to influence the political direction of Russia.
Looking back at Belarus in the previous two years, we see that the West successfully used this opportunity to support the opposition figure Tikhanovskaya, making her a member of the West. Lukashenko was almost overthrown at the time, and it was only with the help of Russia that he was able to stabilize the situation.
At present, Tikhanovskaya has the support of the West, and it is expected that in the next Belarus **, it may again become a tool of the West to overthrow the current regime. Putin must remain vigilant, even if the outlook seems bleak, because the United States is likely not to miss this unique opportunity.
In this scenario, even in the event of failure, U.S. intervention could have a significant impact on Russia.