It is not uncommon for students to be caught cheating on exams in the United States, and if students are found by professors after being caught, then they must explain and fight accordingly through the appeal process of each school, and strive to reduce the punishment. In the face of such a difficult situation, students generally do not know how to communicate with the university to maximize their interests and obtain the lightest academic and administrative sanctions.
With the help of truth-seeking emergency response experts, students were caught cheating on exams in the United States, and finally turned the danger into a successful case, let's take a look
Student L is a highly talented student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and in the first two years of college, his overall GPA was not bad, but in the later stage of college, because the difficulty of the course skyrocketed, student L began to struggle with his Xi, because of this, student L slowly became nervous and unconfident.
In a mid-term exam, due to the tight time and difficult questions, Student L secretly uploaded the questions to Chegg through his mobile phone, but his every move was watched by the professor and Ta, and he found Student L in the middle of the exam, asked him to hand over his mobile phone and asked him to communicate with them about the specific situation after the exam. Because his situation was very solid, the professor finally chose to report it. After the report, student L wrote a statement to the school and participated in the initial investigation meeting, but the result was very unsatisfactory and he was recommended to be suspended.
Since the suspension is a record, and it will affect the graduation progress and graduate school application, so student L realized the seriousness of the matter, so he immediately began to seek a solution.
After learning about the actual situation and current progress of student L, the teacher in the early stage immediately fed back the information he learned one by one to Mr. Zhao, who was responsible for emergency response in the later stage. After Mr. Zhao sorted out the content, he had a one-on-one communication with student L, confirming the previous records, the academic status of the previous course, the time and place when the incident was discovered, and the words used to communicate with the professor at that time. After understanding the specific situation, Mr. Zhao helped Student L sort out the ideas for the follow-up appeal, and then wrote a verbatim script for the next hearing according to Student L's writing Xi, and prepared the questions and relevant answers that the other party might ask.
Two days before the hearing, Mr. Zhao and student L conducted one-on-one mock and training, and gave relevant suggestions based on the performance of the mock. In the end, the school decided to reduce student L's suspension to probation until graduation and score 0 in the exam, and then no more offenses. Student L was very satisfied with this result, and bluntly said that he had never thought that he could escape the catastrophe, so far the matter of student L being caught cheating in the American exam was successfully resolved.
American colleges and universities have always been lenient in and strict in and out, and they also attach great importance to academic integrity, and once they are violated, they almost have zero tolerance. If the school cannot be explained and persuaded in the hearing or meeting session, even if the other party does not have conclusive evidence in their hands, they can still give a punishment that will be recorded in the file, let alone be found on the spot.