Ancient martial arts** "Heaven and Dragon Slayer" revealed: the magical power of the dragon slaying knife.
Martial arts supreme, sword slaying dragon, command the world, don't dare to disobey!”
Jin Yong's dragon slaying knife is different from other divine weapons, and it is mainly anti-guest, causing disputes in the rivers and lakes.
Commanding the World: The Deep Code of Chinese Civilization.
In "Heaven and Dragon Slayer", the slogan "Command the world, don't dare to disobey" directly hits the core of Chinese civilization. The Chinese ancestors have pursued group power from ancient times to the present, and the monarch has become the supreme leadership model. The Chinese civilization, which is obsessed with "commanding the world and not daring to disobey", why can't it be called science and technology?
Ancient belief: There is strength in numbers.
Since ancient times, due to the underdevelopment of productive forces, Chinese civilization has relied on the strength of its bare hands, and has found that group strength is the key to survival. The centralization of the monarch has become supreme, and the command of the world is not to be followed.
Intrigue Game: The pinnacle of the monarch**.
After feudal society, the monarch became more and more centralized. "Command the world, don't dare to disobey", has become the pinnacle of the pursuit of the thousand-year-old feudal society.
The importance of leadership.
The Chinese ancestors regarded "understanding" as leadership, and the ability to claim "leadership" determines personal destiny. Why is Chinese civilization obsessed with "commanding the world, not daring to disobey", but it is called science and technology?
The ruthlessness of science and technology: recognize reason but not people.
Technology does not act according to people's preferences, but only recognizes objective laws. Unlike monarchs, technology is "fatherless, fatherless, and motherless", and cannot be understood by understanding.
An Examination of Chinese Civilization: Strange Tricks and Tricks
The Chinese ancestors, who were obsessed with "commanding the world and not daring to disobey", regarded science and technology as "strange and ingenious" and accused them of carving insects.
Immovable Technology: The Blind Spot of Chinese Civilization.
The ruthlessness of science and technology makes it impossible to integrate into the persistence of Chinese civilization. Chinese civilization, why can't it be called science and technology?
Conclusion: The existence of the Dragon Slayer Knife and the immovable technology.
The dragon slaying knife in "Heaven and Dragon Slayer", like Chinese civilization, commands the world. And technology, as an immovable thing, is destined to fail to become a part of Chinese civilization. The Chinese civilization, which is obsessed with "commanding the world and not daring to disobey", may be precisely because of this obsession that science and technology cannot gain a foothold in its system.
Commentary: The Ancient Wisdom of Chinese Civilization and the Problems of Science and Technology.
This article profoundly explores the core concept of Chinese civilization - "command the world, don't dare to disobey", and the heterogeneous status of science and technology in this system. In ancient civilizations, the idea of commanding the world was deeply rooted in the ideas of the Chinese ancestors, and the bizarre nature of this idea made it difficult for technology to find a foothold in it.
First of all, the article mentions the dragon slaying knife in "Heaven and Dragon Slayer", which is different from other divine weapons, but it has caused disputes among the rivers and lakes. This anti-guest-oriented phenomenon is in stark contrast to the concept of "commanding the world and not daring to disobey" in Chinese civilization. The power of this command reached its peak among the ancient monarchs, forming a unique system of rule, however, this system was powerless in the face of technology.
Secondly, through the analysis of science and technology, the article points out that the essence of science and technology is that it does not recognize people and only acts according to objective laws. Compared to the concepts of leadership and "understanding" in Chinese civilization, technology appears cold and ruthless. It is not dependent on the monarch and does not need to claim leadership, which conflicts with the idea of centralization that Chinese civilization has always pursued. This also explains why Chinese civilization is so obsessed with the monarch in feudal society, while remaining alienated from technology.
The article also highlights the strong identification of the Chinese ancestors with "leadership" through the story of Li Shanchang. In this story, Li Shanchang's choice shows his understanding of Zhu Yuanzhang, which has become the key to the success of his career. However, this perception becomes meaningless in the face of technology, which is not subject to the identity and leadership of individuals, it is independent of people's subjective will.
Finally, through the comparison of Chinese civilization and technology, the article draws a conclusion: the Chinese civilization's obsession with the concept of "commanding the world and not daring to disobey" makes it impossible for science and technology to find a sense of belonging in it. This also reflects that in modern society, the development of Chinese civilization in the field of science and technology is relatively lagging behind, and it is necessary to find a balance between traditional wisdom and modern technology.
Overall, this article provides an in-depth reflection on the relationship between Chinese civilization and technology. Through the analysis of elements such as the dragon slaying sword, monarch**, science and technology, readers have a deeper understanding of the history of Chinese civilization and the modern development of science and technology. This has also led to thinking about how traditional wisdom and modern technology can be integrated with each other.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!