Diversified dispute resolution, so mediation runs throughout, mediation before case filing, mediation before, during and after trial after case filing, mediation in the court of second instance after appeal, and mediation in execution.
If the case has already entered trial, the presiding judge asks if it is possible to mediateWhat does it mean?Is it the meaning of the other party?Or does the judge mean it?Or can the judge adjust it?Will mediation be a disadvantage?Isn't there nothing going on without mediation?
Shoes can only be worn on their own feet to know whether they are suitable or not.
Why is it called "party"?WhenexperiencedthingSon'speople
Therefore, only when the parties know the truth best and grasp the "facts" best, and before filing a lawsuit, the plaintiff has gone through various methods such as negotiation and urging to be ineffective and helpless, and then goes to the court to file a lawsuit.
Whether it can be adjusted and how to adjust it, the plaintiff should have a spectrum in his heart.
As for the defendant, if there is responsibility, but the financial ability is limited, mediation is a good solution, but the sincerity of mediation depends on the amount and time of the first payment.
Therefore, if the judge asks if it is possible to mediate, the plaintiff can tell the judge the reasons for the facts, talk about his mediation plan, and ask the judge to ask the defendant.
That is, to show that mediation is possible, and to say the mediation plan. The plaintiff's mediation plan must be based on evidence, and must not be compromised.
If the judge asks if it is possible to mediate, the defendant can talk about the facts, and the facts said by the defendant may be very different from the facts said by the plaintiff, so the facts said by the defendant must be supported by evidence, if there is no difference in the understanding of the facts, but the plaintiff is expected to give in on the amount, then tell the judge his thoughts, and the judge will judge whether to continue mediation.
If there is a big discrepancy between the facts, then ask the court to hear and ascertain the facts before seeing if mediation can be made.
For the accused, it is very important to ascertain the facts.
Of course, there are some situations where the original defendant needs a mediation letter issued by the court, such as not going to the Civil Affairs Bureau for divorce, but going to the court in the hope that the court's judgment or mediation letter can clarify the ownership of the property, such as some contract disputes go to the court to issue a mediation letter.
In these cases, both the plaintiff and the defendant should take the initiative to explain the intention of mediation to the judge and hand over the mediation agreement to the court. In this way, there is no need to arrange**, and a mediation letter can be issued as soon as possible.
Regardless of whether the judge asks whether it can be mediated, as isParties, you have to know in your heart.