On December 1, in the first game of the second phase of the CBA, there was a huge controversy and farce. In the contest with the Qingdao team, the Xinjiang team suffered a black start and lost to the opponent. The penalty shooting situation in this game caused a lot of controversy and dissatisfaction, and the players and coaches on both sides expressed great anger and disappointment about it. In the game, Qingdao's Chinese players Jokic and Yang Hansen performed well, and the foreign players also played perfectly, they scored a total of 40+ points. At the same time, the generals of the Xinjiang team expressed extreme dissatisfaction with the penalty shooting situation in the game. After the game, Qi Lin, the former national player of the men's basketball team of the Xinjiang team, posted a social ** dynamic, which was "30:6 free throws?"."He couldn't understand the huge disparity in the number of free throws between the two sides.
Xinjiang's head coach, Qiu Biao, was also outspoken about the number of free throws made in the game, saying he had never seen such a difference in his 20-year basketball career. In fact, the difference in the number of free throws in this game was quite exaggerated. The final statistic showed that Qingdao made 36 free throws, while Xinjiang only had 12. But what is even more exaggerated is that in the previous game, the difference in free throws once reached a score of 28:3. In the middle of the third quarter, Qingdao made 28 free throws, while Xinjiang only had three. The disparity in the number of free throws is simply too great. Although the Xinjiang team's style of play may be problematic and they did not take the initiative to attack the inside, this gap is equivalent to nine times, which is really a bit excessive.
In the game, there was even a shocking scene: Qingdao team made 4 free throws in one round, and if they made a three-pointer, it was equivalent to scoring 7 points in one round. The gap is simply too great. The penalty shooting situation in this game caused a lot of controversy and dissatisfaction. The huge disparity in the number of free throws raises questions about the fairness of the game. Whether it was the tactical issues in the game or the referee's decision, the game became a point of controversy in the history of the CBA. Fans want to see the game just and fair, not be affected by the disparity in the number of free throws. However, despite the controversy and dissatisfaction of the game, basketball is always a competition, and winning or losing is a common thing.
The Xinjiang team turned their frustration and anger into motivation, believing that they will go back and continue to work hard to perfect their game strategy and technique. The world of basketball has always been full of competition and variables, and only by constantly improving and improving can you win in the heat of the game. I hope that future matches can be more fair, so that players can show their strength and skills in a fair environment. In the game, the referee's blowing penalty has been controversial, which made the Xinjiang team's general very dissatisfied. Especially in the first 40 minutes, 36 to 8 free throws, which is a chilling number. Even if all these 8 goals were scored, Qingdao only scored 30. This kind of bias on the part of the referee is really unacceptable.
The head coach of the Xinjiang team, Ru Shuai Qiu Biao, directly sprayed free throws, and he bluntly said that the Xinjiang team was more than 20 points short of free throws, how to play this game?National player Qi Lin also said dissatisfiedly on social **, 30 to 6, is such a free throw ratio really reasonable?The refereeing problem in this game not only caused dissatisfaction among the players, but also the coach. Whether the referee's blowing penalty is fair or not is a question in front of everyone. What's the point of a game if the referee can't guarantee fairness?In the game, the role of the referee is crucial. They need to ensure the fairness of the game, so that the game can be more fair and just, and it can also make the players more engaged in the game. But if the referee's blowing penalty is biased, then the game loses its meaning of existence.
In this game, the referee's blowing penalty caused dissatisfaction among the players and coaches, as well as the dissatisfaction of the majority of fans. Referees should reflect on their own behavior and make more fair blows in the next game, so that the game is more fair and just, and the audience can see a more exciting game.