The first interception of an anti ship ballistic missile, a record for a US destroyer, what should w

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-31

SinceU.S. militaryDestroyersdDG-58 "RabEn".DestroyersSuccessfully intercepted 3 anti-ships in the Gulf of AdenBallistic missilespost, globalMilitaryThe world is eye-catching. This result can be called a fruitful one, and it is not only reflectedU.S. militaryThe strong strength also shows that their anti-missile capability has been greatly improved.

Raboon".DestroyersAt the same time, in cooperation with F-18E F fighters, 12 UAVs and 2 aircraft were successfully interceptedCruise missiles。The fruits of this battle are so fruitful that people can't help but wonder about the reason behind it. It is no exaggeration to say that anti-shipBallistic missilesThe interception is not an easy task, howeverU.S. militaryAnd it can be done. So, does this feat meanU.S. militaryCapable of intercepting anti-ships of other countriesBallistic missilesWhat about it?To answer this question, we need to analyze it from three perspectives:U.S. militaryanti-missile capabilities, HouthiArmedofMissilesperformance as well as our Chinese anti-shipBallistic missilesPerformance.

According to the message,U.S. militaryDestroyers"Raboon" uses the "Standard 3" anti-missile interceptor missile, which is of this typeMissilesFor the first time, it was successful in real combat. ThisMissilesAdopt 3 levelsSolid rocketspower, and is equipped with an infrared kinetic energy interceptor as a warhead. Although in multiple trials,"Standard 3 "MissileOnly those with a range of 5500 km can be interceptedBallistic missiles, and the success rate of interception is not high, but it still has advanced technology, and the United States has applied its achievements in miniaturization technology and material technology to thisMissilesAbove.

However, due to the United StatesNavyThe equipped MK41 hair pendant is not large enough and is limited "Standard 3 "Missile, resulting in the overall performance being affected. Even ifU.S. militaryConcentrated a large number of advanced technologies, it is also difficult to achieve a range of more than 5500 kilometersBallistic missilesStable interception. This also reminds us of a fact: anti-shipBallistic missilesThe longer the range, the higher its maximum velocity, and the more difficult it is to intercept.

Many are against the HouthisArmedThe impression is still at the stage of the "slipper army", however, under the tempering of many years of war, as well as Iran and other countriesMilitarySupport andPatronage, HouthisArmedofMilitaryThe level of technology is not weak. HouthisArmedPossession of a variety of anti-shipsBallistic missiles, theseMissilesThe technology originated in Iran.

It can be broadly divided into two types, one is from traditionBallistic missilesdeveloped anti-shipBallistic missiles, the maximum firing range can reach 1400 km, although there is no pneumatic article descriptionU.S. militaryDestroyers"Raboon" successfully intercepted anti-ships in the Gulf of AdenBallistic missilessituation, and rightU.S. militaryanti-missile capabilities, HouthiArmedofMissilesperformance, as well as Chinese anti-shipMissilesPerformance was analyzed.

The article statesU.S. militaryThe "Standard 3" anti-missile interceptor missile used was only able to intercept a range of 5500 km in several testsBallistic missiles, and the interception success rate is not high. United StatesNavyThe size of the MK41 hair pendant is limited".Standard 3 "Missileperformance.

HouthisArmedofMissilesThere are two types of technology, one is an anti-ship with a range of up to 1400 kmBallistic missiles, the other is from air defenseMissilesConverted anti-shipBallistic missiles。Among them, anti-shipBallistic missilesThe range is relatively short and the trajectory is fixed, making it less difficult to intercept.

Chinese anti-shipMissilesIncluding:Dongfeng 21dand Dongfeng-26, both of which are equipped with bipyramidal warheads capable of maneuvering. This makes interception of this kindMissilesThe difficulty increases exponentially. The article suggests that China should use it as soon as possibleDongfeng-26 missilesReplaceDongfeng 21d, and continue to increase the number to ensure an effective breakthroughU.S. militaryAnti-missile system.

Overall, thoughU.S. militaryAble to intercept the HouthisArmedLaunched anti-shipBallistic missiles, but for Chinese anti-shipsMissiles, due to technical differences,U.S. militaryThere may be even greater challenges. Therefore, China should continue to upgrade and develop its own anti-shipsMissilestechnology to ensure that it has the ability to break through the enemy's anti-missile system.

Related Pages