A man of literature and dreams.
Recently, there are two things that are estimated to have made the United States a little disgraced and very unhappy.
Let's start with the first one. The United States was slapped in the face by its own company, Google, and Putin said: Interesting.
On November 24, Russia's ** Putin attended the "Artificial Intelligence World Tour" international conference held in Moscow, who knew that when he visited the exhibition of artificial intelligence-related products, he was told that the ** of the US lunar mission was false, and it was judged that it was the Americans' own technology - Google's neural network, that is, Google's artificial intelligence technology.
The difference is that the Google neural network did not find any abnormalities in the ** judgment of China's lunar rover, and "did not identify any special problems". They were all filmed on the moon, so why did the judgment of Google's neural network have completely opposite results?It can only be said that someone has done something wrong in this matter and faked it.
American astronaut Armstrong famously said when he landed on the moon: "One small step for me, one giant leap for humanity." What a great irony today!Who knows what kind of fraud he is referring to in one big step?The earth couldn't accommodate them, and they stretched their feet to the moon all at once.
When Putin heard this report, he made a meaningful assessment: interesting.
In fact, doubts about the authenticity of the U.S. moon landing did not begin with the exhibition, and the international community has been debating this issue.
First of all, the U.S. moon landing is full of loopholes. After careful study, observers found that there were many irrationalities in the US moon landing**. For example, the shadows in ** are not oriented in an inconsistent direction and do not show the true texture of the lunar surface. In addition, some of the objects in ** appear to be too clear to correspond to the actual environment on the lunar surface. These loopholes cast doubt on the authenticity of the U.S. moon landing.
Secondly, why can't the United States, which has already mastered the technology of landing on the moon, return to the moon now?Moreover, its plan to return to the moon has been postponed again and again, and this will inevitably make people question the US space technology, a country that once planted its national flag on the moon, but now it cannot climb it
How does the United States explain the falsification of the moon landing?
Let's talk about the second piece. The United States is shy to apply for lunar soil samples from China, but China will not give them?
On November 28, the Chinese manned space engineering delegation began a six-day trip to Hong Kong and Macao. Through various forms of exchange activities, the delegation briefed Hong Kong and Macao compatriots on the achievements and future plans for the development of China's manned space industry. In the meantime, a piece of news about the United States has been quite chewable.
On December 1, news from Hong Kong's South China Morning Post revealed that the United States had applied to China for lunar soil samples collected by China. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) told its insiders that it is seeking to give Congress a "green light" on the "Wolf Clause" that would allow researchers to apply for and study lunar samples taken by China, which is too "unique" to be in an area that NASA has not yet collected.
To be honest, when the United States applied for lunar soil samples from China, I don't know if they tasted the smell of shooting themselves in the foot. Back then, the U.S. Congress passed the "Wolf Clause", which for the first time banned space cooperation with China in the form of legislation to prevent the transfer of "technology, data or other information related to *** or economic security to China or Chinese companies" related to it.
According to the "Wolf Clause," the United States prohibits NASA from cooperating with China in any space technology, and even prohibits it from having contact with Chinese. The essence of this ban is a total blockade of China's space technology.
You are afraid that we will "steal" your technology and refuse to cooperate. Now, seeing that this ban has not only not played a role in stopping China's progress, but has inspired the Chinese to explore space on their own and reaped fruitful fruits, the "Wolf Clause" has increasingly become a shackle that restricts the development of the United States itself. It's good now, and he stretched out his hand to us with a shy face. Your own bans, don't you enforce them yourself?
Of course, you should not think that because of the need for lunar soil samples, the United States will change its original intention of completely blocking China's space technology. Their quest for a "green light" from Congress is just a special case for the Chang'e-5 mission sample, and the ban on space cooperation with China remains in effect.
So, when the United States applied for lunar soil samples from China, you said, can you give them?
The main focus of China's aerospace industry is self-reliance, but the development of the aerospace field requires the joint efforts of all countries, so we have never rejected international cooperation. For example, in the case of the lunar soil samples that the United States wants this time, China donated 1. to Russia and France in 2022 and 2023, respectively5 grams. Don't look at only a mere 15 grams, that's the only rare mineral on the earth, no matter how much money you can't buy it!
China has never given up on international cooperation and has been carrying out relevant exchanges and cooperation with other countries. As for the United States, let's wait. When the ban on China will be lifted, let's discuss it again, okay?