Affected by the "Palestinian-Israeli conflict" incident, Israel insisted on military action and forcefully rejected the US armistice demand. Despite the heavy losses suffered by "Hamas" in the conflict, Israel has not shown a willingness to cease fighting, which has triggered strong accusations from the international community. The United States** proposed a "two-state solution" that demanded that Israel completely resolve the disputed issues and return the land, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu firmly rejected it. Behind this refusal is not only the insistence on military action, but also the deeper reason lies in the multifaceted contradictions that exist between the leaders of the United States and Israel. The United States** has always been relatively clear on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, insisting that the conflict must stop, and at the same time putting forward a "two-state solution" in order to resolve the root causes of the conflict. However, Israel's tough refusal is confusing. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel has learned its security lessons and will never allow the Palestinians to control Gaza again, and will not withdraw even if the objectives of the military operation are achieved. This attitude clearly runs counter to the US proposition and also exposes the differences between the United States and Israel in handling the Middle East issue. In fact, there are many contradictions between the United States and Israel.
The first is that on the Iranian issue, the United States is committed to reviving the JCPOA, while Netanyahu is firmly opposed and believes that the Iran nuclear deal has failed to effectively limit Iran's nuclear activities. Secondly, on the issue of Jerusalem, the United States maintains that the final status of Jerusalem should be resolved in the Palestinian-Israeli peace talks, while Netanyayahu insists that Jerusalem is the inalienable capital of Israel. These differences and contradictions make it difficult for the United States and Israel to reach a common position on the Middle East issue. In addition, Israel's hard-line attitude has also aroused widespread concern and criticism from the international community. Despite Israel's claim that the military action was carried out in "self-defence", the international community has expressed concern about the disproportionate and continuing nature of its military action. The UN Secretary-General has called for an immediate ceasefire, and Britain, France, Germany and other countries have also demanded a cessation of hostilities between Israel and Palestine. Israel** should respond to the call of the international community to seek a solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through dialogue and negotiation and to avoid further escalation of the conflict. Under the current international situation, Israel should have a clear understanding of the situation, respect the appeal of the international community, respond positively to the demands of the United States, stop military action as soon as possible, and seek a solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict through dialogue and negotiation.
At the same time, the United States should also intensify its mediation efforts to promote the resumption of dialogue between the two sides as soon as possible and make more positive efforts to resolve the Middle East issue. Peace and stability in the Middle East can only be achieved through the joint efforts of both sides. Biden's feud with Netanyahu is nothing new. The two ** disagree on a number of issues, leading to a rift in the relationship between the two countries. One of the biggest points of contention is the Palestinian question and Israeli settlement construction in the occupied Palestinian territories. Biden believes that Israel's construction of settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories is a violation of international law and should be dismantled. Netanyahu, on the other hand, sees these settlements as a necessary means of guaranteeing Israel's security. This disagreement has made it difficult for the two countries to reach a consensus on the Palestinian issue. In addition, the two countries are at odds about improving U.S. relations with Arab countries and promoting clean energy. Biden is committed to improving relations between the United States and Arab countries and promoting the Arab-Israeli peace process. Netanyahu, on the other hand, has a distrust of Arab countries, which he sees as a security threat to Israel.
In addition, Biden advocates the development of clean energy and reduces the consumption of fossil energy, while Netanyahu attaches more importance to Israel's economic interests and hopes that Israel will become an important energy country in Europe. These differences have led to tensions between the two countries. Despite Netanyahu's toughness, U.S. support for Israel is essential. Therefore, the two countries need to seek consensus on a number of issues to maintain their relations. Only in this way can we ensure peace and stability in the region.